Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-fmk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T18:24:46.849Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Acceptable Aluminum Additions for Minimal Environmental Effect in Iron-Aluminum Alloys*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 1992

Vinod K. Sikka ,
Srinath Viswanathan  and
SANJAY Vyas
Vinod K. Sikka
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, P.O. Box 2008, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6083
Srinath Viswanathan
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, P.O. Box 2008, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6083
SANJAY Vyas
Affiliation:
Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburghs, PA 15213
Get access

Abstract

A systematic study of iron-aluminum alloys has shown that Fe-16 at. % Al alloys are not very sensitive to environmental embrittlement. The Fe-22 and -28 at. % Al alloys are sensitive to environmental embrittlement, and the effect can be reduced by the addition of chromium and through the control of grain size by additions of zirconium and carbon. The Fe-16 at. % Al binary, and alloys based on it, yielded over 20% room-temperature (RT) elongation even after high-temperature annealing treatments at 1100°C. The best values for the Fe-22 and -28 at. % Al-base alloys after similar annealing treatments were 5 and 10%, respectively. A multi-component alloy, FAP, based on Fe-16 at. % Al was designed, which gave an RT ductility of over 25%.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 288: Symposium L – High-Temperature Ordered Intermetallic Alloys V , 1992 , 971
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. McKamey, C. G., DeVan, J. H., Tortorelli, P. F., and Sikka, V. K., “A Review of Recent Developments on Fe3Al-Based Alloys,” J. Mater. Res. 6(8), 1779–1805, 1991.Google Scholar
2. Liu, C. T., McKamey, C. G., and Lee, E. H., “Environmental Effects on Room-Temperature Ductility and Fracture in Fe3Al,” Scr. Metall. 24(2), 385, 1990.Google Scholar
3. Liu, C. T. and McKamey, C. G., “Environmental Embrittlement – A Major Cause for Low Ductility of Ordered Intermetallics,” pp. 133–51 in High Temperature Aluminides and Intermetallics, ed. Whang, S. H., Liu, C. T., Pope, D. P., and Stiegler, J. O., TMS-AIME (The Metallurgical Society of AIME), 1990.Google Scholar
4. Sikka, V. K., “Ductility Enhancement of Iron-Aluminide Alloys,” SAMPE Quarterly 22(4), 2–10, 1991.Google Scholar
5. Sanders, P. G., Sikka, V. K., Howell, C. R., and Baldwin, R. H., “A Processing Method to Reduce Environmental Embrittlement in Fe3Al-Based Alloys,” Scr. Metall. 25, 2365–2369, 1991.Google Scholar
6. Vyas, S., Viswanathan, S., and Sikka, V. K., “Effect of Aluminum Content on Environmental Embrittlement in Binary Iron-Aluminum Alloys,” Scr. Metall. 27, 185–90, 1992.Google Scholar
7. Buchanan, R. A. and Kim, J. G., “Chloride-Induced Localized Corrosion of Fe3Al-Type Iron Aluminides: Beneficial Effects of Cr and Mo Additions,” pp. 945–56 in High-Temperature Ordered Intermetallic Alloys IV,ed. Johnson, L. A., Pope, D. P., and Stiegler, J. O., Materials Research Society, 1990.Google Scholar