Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-lrf7s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T23:23:17.616Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Active Site Structure in Zeolite-Supported Lean NOx Catalysts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Richard J. Blint*
Affiliation:
Physics and Physical Chemistry Department, Research and Development Center, Mail Code 480–106–185, General Motors Corporation, 30500 Mound Road, Box 9055, Warren, MI 48090–9055
Get access

Abstract

Copper ions exchanged into the zeolite, ZSM-5, are known to catalyze the reduction of NO to N2 in the oxidizing environment of lean automotive exhaust, but do require trace hydrocarbons. The interface of this catalyst provides a locally reducing environment even when the surrounding exhaust has molecular oxygen concentrations as high as 10%. The mechanism of this reduction is still unclear; however, structure calculations of the active sites and dynamics simulations of species diffusion within the zeolite pores provide insight into the mechanism of reduction. One active site is proposed to be Cu++ ionically bound to a bridge oxygen in a nonsymmetric site within a zeolitic pore. Another proposed site has the copper ion centrally (symmetrically) bound within a six member zeolitic ring. Evidence suggests that the copper ions cycle between Cu++ and Cu+ during the reduction of NO to N2. The nonsymmetric copper ions are shown here to be hydrated ions attached to the Brønsted acid sites in the zeolite. The calculations here show a four member, first hydration shell for Cu++ and a first shell of 2–3 oxygens for the Cu+ ion. An examination of the pore size in ZSM-5 indicates sufficient room for a first and second hydration shell for most of the possible acid sites. The conclusion that the copper ions are typically hydrated suggests that the catalytic mechanism may have much in common with homogeneous catalysis which is sometimes termed heterogenized homogeneous catalysis.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] van Bekkum, H., Flanigen, E. M., and Jansen, J. C., in Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis, volume 58, (Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1991).Google Scholar
[2] Moulijn, J. A., van Leeuwen, P., and Santen, R. A. V., in Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis, volume 79, (Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1993), p. 441Google Scholar
[3] Iwamoto, M. et al., J. Chem. Soc, Chem. Comm., 1272 (1986).Google Scholar
[4] Li, Y. and Hall, W. K., J. Phys. Chem. 94, 6145 (1990).Google Scholar
[5] Held, W., Konig, A., Richter, T., and Puppe, L., Catalytic NO x reduction in net oxidizing exhaust, Technical Report 900496, SAE, 1990.Google Scholar
[6] Burch, R. and Millington, P. J., App. Catal. B 2, 101 (1993).Google Scholar
[7] Lei, G. D., Adelman, B. J., Sárkány, J., and Sachtier, W. M. H., App. Catal. B 5, 245 (1995).Google Scholar
[8] Kharas, K. C. C., App. Catal. B 2, 207 (1993).Google Scholar
[9] Ansell, G. P. et al., App. Catal. B 2, 81 (1993).Google Scholar
[10] Kucherov, A. V., Kucherova, T. N., and Slinkin, A. A., Catal. Lett. 10, 289 (1991).Google Scholar
[11] Cotton, F. A. and Wilkinson, G., Advanced inorganic chemistry, (Interscience Publishers, third edition, 1972).Google Scholar
[12] Liu, D. and Robota, H. J., in ACS SYMPOSIUM SERIES, volume 587, (American Chemical Society, 1995), p. 147.Google Scholar
[13] van Koningsveld, H., van Bekkum, H., and Jansen, J. C., Acta Cryst. B34, 127 (1987).Google Scholar
[14] Frisch, M. J. et al., Gaussian 92, Revision A, Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, 1992.Google Scholar
[15] Dunning, T. H. and Hay, P. J., in Modern Theoretical Chemistry, edited by Schaefer, H. R., volume 3, (Plenum, New York, NY, 1977), p. 1.Google Scholar
[16] Binkley, J. S., Pople, J. A., and Hehre, W. J., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 102, 939 (1980).Google Scholar
[17] Gordon, M. S., Binkley, J. S., Pople, J. A., Pietro, W. J., and Hehre, W. J., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 104, 2797 (1982).Google Scholar
[18] Pietro, W. J. et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 104, 5039 (1982).Google Scholar
[19] Hehre, W. J., Ditchfield, R., and Pople, J. A., J. Chem. Phys. 56, 2257 (1972).Google Scholar
[20] Hariharan, P. C. and Pople, J. A., Theor. Chim. Acta 28, 213 (1973).Google Scholar
[21] Gordon, M. S., Chem. Phys. Lett. 76, 163 (1980).Google Scholar
[22] Wadt, W. R. and Hay, P. J., J. Chem. Phys. 82, 284 (1985).Google Scholar
[23] Hay, P. J. and Wadt, W. R., J. Chem. Phys. 82, 299 (1985).Google Scholar
[24] Moller, C. and Plesset, M. S., Phys. Rev. 46, 618 (1934).Google Scholar
[25]The results published were generated using the program Cerius2™. This program was developed by Molecular Simulations Incorporated.Google Scholar
[26] Brand, H. V., Curtiss, L. A., and Iton, L. E., J. Phys. Chem. 96, 7725 (1992).Google Scholar
[27] Schneider, W. F. and Hass, K. C., J. Phys. Chem. 100, 9292 (1996).Google Scholar
[28] Blint, R. J., J. Phys. Chem. 100, 19518 (1996).Google Scholar
[29] Schneider, W. F., Hass, K. C., Ramprasad, R., and Adams, J. B., J. Phys. Chem. 100, 6032 (1996).Google Scholar
[30] Schneider, W. F., Hass, K. C., Ramprasad, R., and Adams, J. B., J. Phys. Chem. (1997), to be published.Google Scholar