Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T11:17:11.047Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Analysis of Defects in Laser Annealed GaAs*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

John Fletcher
Affiliation:
Solid State Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830
J. Narayan
Affiliation:
Solid State Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830
D. H. Lowndes
Affiliation:
Solid State Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830
Get access

Abstract

The nature and depth distributions of residual damage in ion implanted and pulsed ruby laser annealed GaAs have been studied using both plan-view and cross-section transmission electron microscopy (TEM) specimens for high dose (1.0 × 1015 cm−2) Zn+, Se+ and Mg+ implants. It was found that laser energy densities above 0.36 J/cm2 were required to remove the implantation damage, this threshold energy density giving good agreement with that indicated by electrical activation measurements. Laser induced surface degradation of the GaAs was present even for energy densities as low as 0.25 J/cm2, and more severe damage, with the introduction of dislocations near the surface, was present for energy densities above 0.8 J/cm2. The use of thin SiO2 layers for encapsulation during laser annealing was found to substantially reduce this surface degradation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Research sponsored by the Division of Materials Science, U. S. Department of Energy under contract W-7405-eng-26 with the Union Carbide Corporation.

References

REFERENCES

1. Narayan, J., White, C. W. and Young, R. T., Rad. Effects 47, 167 (1980).Google Scholar
2. White, C. W., Narayan, J. and Young, R. T., Science 204, 461 (1979).Google Scholar
3. Laser-Solid Interactions and Laser Processing-1978 (AlP Conf. Proc. 50) ed. by Ferris, S. D., Leamy, H. J. and Poate, J. M., (American Institute of Physics, New York, 1979).Google Scholar
4. Laser and Electron Beam Processing of Materials, ed. by White, C. W. and Peercy, P. S., (Academic Press, New York 1980).Google Scholar
5. Sadana, D. K., Wilson, M. C. and Booker, G. R., J. of Microscopy 118, 51 (1980)Google Scholar
6. Campisano, S. U., Foti, G., Rimini, E., Eisen, F. H., Tseng, W. F., Nicolet, M-A. and Tandon, J. L., J. Appl. Phys. 51, 295 (1980).Google Scholar
7. Lowndes, D. H., Cleland, J. W., Christie, W. H. and Eby, R. E., to be published in Laser and Electron Beam Solid Interactions and Materials Processing Boston, Massachusetts 1980.Google Scholar
8. Cullis, A. G., Weber, H. C. and Bailey, P., J. Phys. E: Sci. Instr. 12, 688 (1979).Google Scholar
9. Fletcher, J., Titchmarsh, J. M. and Booker, G. R., EMAG 1979 (Institute of Physics Conf. Series No. 52) p. 153, 1980.Google Scholar
10. Fletcher, J. and Booker, G. R., J. Electrochem. Soc. 80–2, 1155 (1980).Google Scholar