Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-s9k8s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-13T08:05:07.862Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Analysis of Electrodeposited NiFe Thin Films for the Development of Planar Fluxgate Magnetic Sensors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Thais Cavalheri dos Santos
Affiliation:
Departamento de Física e Matemática - FFCLRP, Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Bandeirantes 3900, Ribeirão Preto-SP, CA, 14040-901, Brazil
Marcelo Mulato
Affiliation:
Departamento de Física e Matemática - FFCLRP, Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Bandeirantes 3900, Ribeirão Preto-SP, CA, 14040-901, Brazil
Get access

Abstract

Nife alloys are potential candidates for the development of planar fluxgate magnetic microsensors. In this work, electrodeposition was used to produce NiFe thin films on top of copper substrates. When using this technique the variation of the electric potential, and thus the current density, alters the final stoichiometry of the deposited films, while the final thickness is determined by the total deposition time. We used current densities varying from 4.0 mA/cm2 to 28 mA/cm2, with steps of 4.0 mA/cm2. For each current density, total deposition times of 10, 20, 30 and 40 minutes were used. The morphology was characterized using scanning electron microscopy, structure was characterized using X-ray diffraction experiments, and the composition of the films were determined using energy dispersive spectroscopy. The magnetic properties were investigated evaluating the materials hysteresis cycle. The materials were optimized aiming for lowest coercivity values, and the final result was about 0.215 kA/m.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Williamson, S.J. and Kaufman, L.. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials. 22, 129201 (1981).Google Scholar
2. Webster, J. G.. Electrical Measurement, Signal Pocessing and Displays. CRC Press, (New York, ISBN: 0–8493–1733–9, 2004).Google Scholar
3. Li., X. P, Zhao, Z. J, Oh, T. B, Seet, H. L, Neo, B. H, Koh, S. J., physica status solidi A-Applied Research 201. 8, 19921995 (2004).Google Scholar
4. Carr, J. Joseph. Electronic Circuit Guidebook. 1: Sensors. Prompt Publications. (Indianapolis, IN, 1997).Google Scholar
5. Primdahl, F.. J. Phys, E: Sci. Instrum. 12, 241253 (1979).Google Scholar
6. Riplka, P., Choi, S. O., Tipek, A., Kawahito, S., Ishida, M.. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 37 (4), (2001).Google Scholar
7. Chiesi, L., Kejik, P., Janossy, B., Popovic, R. S.. Sensors and Actuators A physical. 82, 174180 (2000).Google Scholar
8. Afshar, A., Dolati, A. g., Ghorbani, M.. Materials Chemistry and Physics. 77, 352358 (2002).Google Scholar
9. Foner, S., J. Appl. Phys. 79 (8), 47404745 (1996).Google Scholar
10. Gallop, J.C., SQUIDs, the Josephson Effects and Superconducting Eletronics (Holt, Rinehart e Winston, New York, 1976).Google Scholar