Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T11:34:16.693Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ancient Analogues Concerning Stability and Durability of Cementitious Wasteform

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

W. Jiang  and
D.M. Roy
W. Jiang
Affiliation:
Materials Research Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
D.M. Roy
Affiliation:
Materials Research Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
Get access

Abstract

The history of cemenütious materials goes back to ancient times. The Greeks and Romans used calcined limestone and later developed pozzolanic cement by grinding together lime and volcanic ash called “pozzolan” which was first found near Port Pozzuoli, Italy. The ancient Chinese used lime-pozzolanic mixes to build the Great Wall. The ancient Egyptians used calcined impure gypsum to build the Great Pyramid of Cheops. The extraordinary stability and durability of these materials has impressed us, when so much dramatically damaged infrastructure restored by using modern portland cement now requires rebuilding. Stability and durability of cementitious materials have attracted intensive research interest and contractors’ concerns, as does immobilization of radioactive and hazardous industrial waste in cementitious materials. Nuclear waste pollution of the environment and an acceptable solution for waste management and disposal constitute among the most important public concerns. The analogy of ancient cementitious materials to modern Portland cement could give us some clues to study their stability and durability. This present study examines selected results of studies of ancient building materials from France, Italy, China, and Egypt, combined with knowledge obtained from the behavior of modern portland cement to evaluate the potential for stability and durability of such materials in nuclear waste forms.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 333: Symposium V – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XVII , 1993 , 335
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Roy, D.M. and Langton, C.A. Technical Report, ONWI-523, Distributions Category UC-70, National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce (December 1983).Google Scholar
2 Langton, C.A. and Roy, D.M. (1984). In Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 26, pp. 543–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 Ghorab, H.Y., Ragai, J. and Antar, A. (1986). Cem. Concr. Res. 16 (6), pp. 813–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 Ragai, J., Ghorab, H.Y. and Antar, A. (1987). Cem. Concr. Res. 17 (1), pp. 12–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 Ragai, J. (1988). Cem. Concr. Res. 18 (1), pp. 9–17; Cem. Concr. Res. 18(2), pp. 179–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 Miao, J.C., Li, Z.Y. Cheng, R. K. and Lu, B.S. (1981). Annals of Silicate Chemistry in China. (Chem. Eng. Press, Beijing), p. 240–247.Google Scholar
7 Lamprecht, H.O.(1986). J. LΊndustria Italiana del Cemento, 7–8, pp. 590–605.Google Scholar
8 Malinowski, R. (1979). Concrete. International. Jan. pp. 66–76.Google Scholar
9 Malinowski, R. (1988). In Geopolymer’ 88 edited by Davidovits, J. and Orlinski, J. (UNIVERSITE DE TECHNOLOGIE DE COMPIEGNE, France), Vol. 2, pp. 233–244.Google Scholar
10 Idorn, G.M. (1959). In Beton-Teknik, 4, pp. 119–141.Google Scholar
11 Idorn, G.M. and Thaulow, N. (1983). Cem. Concr. Res. 13 (5), pp. 739–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12 Smolczyk, H.G. (1984). Report of Forschungsgemeinschaft, Eisenhuuttenschlacken, Duisburg, Weat Germany.Google Scholar
13 Idorn, G.M. and Thaulow, N. (1984). Report of G.M. Idorn Consult ApS.Google Scholar
14 Dunster, A.M. (1992). J. Advances in Cement Research, 4 (14), pp. 69–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15 Yang, N., Wang, Z. and Jiang, W. (1984). J. Chinese Chromatography, 1 (2), pp. 118–121.Google Scholar
16 Glukhovsky, V.D. (1989). In Durability of Concrete Aspects of Admixtures and Industrial By-Products. Ed. Berntsson, et al. , Swedish Council for Building Research, Stockholm, Sweden, pp. 53–61.Google Scholar
17 Wu, X., Jiang, W. and Roy, D.M. (1990). Cem. Concr. Res. 20 (6), pp. 961–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18 Roy, D.M. and Jiang, W. (1993). (PAC RIM, Cement Technology Symposium, Honolulu, in progress).Google Scholar
19 Collepardi, M. (1990). J. Materials and Structures, 23, pp. 81–102.Google Scholar
20 Roy, D.M. (1981). Instructional Modules in Cement Science (The Pennsylvania State University, University Park), p. 52.Google Scholar
21 Taylor, H.F.W. (1990). Cement Chemistry. (Academic Press, London), p. 138.Google Scholar
22 Yang, Z. and Zheng, Q. (1992). Report No. C-342, Nanjing Inst. of Chem. Tech. China.Google Scholar
23 Hanson, J. (1982). Science Vol. 218, December, p. 50.Google Scholar
24 Bobrowski, J. (1987). J. Concrete (UK), 21 (4), p.7.Google Scholar
25 Willett, J.A. (1979). Concrete International, Aug. pp. 58–61.Google Scholar
26 Parrott, L.J. and Killoh, D.C. (1989). Cement and Concrete Research, 19 (4), pp. 649–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27 Bequette, F. (1990). In Environment 90/91, edited by Allen, J. (The Duskin Publishing Group, Inc. Annual Edition, Guilford, Connecticut), pp.88–90.Google Scholar