Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-x5cpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T21:28:17.696Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Applications of Images Digital Analysis in the Characterisation of Grains Morphology Influence in Mechanical Behaviour of Granular Soils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Bonifazi G ,
Sappa G  and
De Casa G
Bonifazi G
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Ingegneria Chimica, dei Materiali, delle Materie Prime e Metallurgia.Universita’ degli studi di Roma “La sapienza”.Via Eudossiana,18 00184 Rome, Italy
Sappa G
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Idraulica, Trasporti e Strade.Universita’ degli studi di Roma “La sapienza”.Via Eudossiana, 18 00184 Rome, Italy
De Casa G
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Idraulica, Trasporti e Strade.Universita’ degli studi di Roma “La sapienza”.Via Eudossiana, 18 00184 Rome, Italy
Get access

Abstract

Preliminary results of a research aimed to identify the influence of the morphological characteristics of the grains constituting a quartz sand on the mechanical behaviour of the sand itself are presented. The tests were conducted on different size class samples resulting from a grain-size classification of the sand following the international standard classification (ASCII) procedure. For each sample traditional direct shear laboratory tests and an accurate characterisation of morphological and morphometrical properties of their constituting elements (grains) by means of digital image processing techniques were conducted. The statistical distribution of the different parameters derived following the two above mentioned procedures was studied and the results discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 362: Symposium J – Grain-Size and Mechanical Properties--Fundamentals and Applications , 1994 , 167
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Lambe, T.W. & Whitman, R.V., “Soil Mechanics”. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1969.Google Scholar
2. Pettijohn, F.J., “Sedimentary Rocks”. Harper & Row publishers, 1949.Google Scholar
3. Heywood, H., “The scope of particle size analysis and standardization” - Symp. on Particle Size Analysis. Inst. Chem. Eng., Road and Building Materials Group, London, 14–24, 1947.Google Scholar
4. Heywood, H., “Particle shape coefficients” J. Imperial Coll. Chemical Society, London, England, 8, 25–33, 1954.Google Scholar
5. Sowers & Sowers, “Engineering Properties of Residual Soils Derived from Igneous and Metamorphic Rocks”, 1951.Google Scholar
6. Horn, H.M., Deere, D.U., “Frictional characteristics of mineral”, Geotecnique, 12, 3 19–335, 1962.Google Scholar
7. Carter, J.E. & Young, I.T., “Analysis of a simple photographic method proposed for determining size distribution of ore fragments” USBM Lab. Report RBM 77 03, 1–19, 1977.Google Scholar
8. Noren, C.H. & Porter, D.D., “A comparison of theoretical explosive energy and energy measured underwater with measured rock fragmentation.”, Proc. 3rd ISRM Congress 2B, 1371–1375, 1974.Google Scholar
9. Farmer, I.W., Kemeny, J.M.& McDoniel, C., “Analysis of rock fragmentation in bench blasting using digital image processing”, Proc. 7th Int. Congr. on Rock Mechanics, Aachen, 1037–1042, 1991.Google Scholar
10. Aimone, C.T. Dowding, C.H., “Fragmentation measurements results for fourteen full-scale production blasts: a comparison with a three dimensional wave code.” - Proc. of the 9th Conference on Explosives and Blasting Technique, 310–333, 1983.Google Scholar
11. Gozon, J.S., Britton, R.R., & Fodo, J.D., “Predetermining average fragment size: Acase study.” - Int. Symp. on Application of Rock Characterization Techniques in Mine Design, 190–195, 1986.Google Scholar
12. Franklin, J.A., Maerz, N.H. Bennett, C.P., “Rock Mass characterization using photoanalysis”, I.J.M.G.E., 6, 97–112, 1988.Google Scholar