Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T15:23:47.303Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Atomistic Simulation of Flow Stress and Dislocation-Interface Interaction in Thin Metal Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

E. S. Ege  and
Y.-L. Shen
E. S. Ege
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of New MexicoAlbuquerque, NM 87131, U.S.A.
Y.-L. Shen
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of New MexicoAlbuquerque, NM 87131, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

This study focuses on the atomistics of interface-mediated plasticity in thin metallic films. Molecular statics simulations are carried out to model the tensile stress-strain response of the free-standing and substrate-bonded films. In the free-standing film dislocation glide readily occurs, inducing slip steps at both surfaces of the film. The existence of an interface with the substrate constrains the dislocation motion in the film and restricts the slip steps to only the free surface. The propensity of film plasticity is dictated by the capability of atoms to slide along the interface. The flow stress of the film can be correlated with the dislocation activities obtained from the simulation. The propensity of spreading of relatively energetic atoms associated with the dislocation near the interface is also discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 778: Symposium U – Mechanical Properties Derived from Nanostructuring Materials , 2003 , U9.4
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Nix, W. D., Metall. Trans. A 20A, 2217 (1989).Google Scholar
2. Heinen, D., Bohn, H. G. and Schilling, W., J. Appl. Phys. 77, 3742 (1995).Google Scholar
3. Thompson, C. V., J. Mater. Res. 8, 237 (1993).Google Scholar
4. Keller, R.-M., Baker, S. P. and Arzt, E., J. Mater. Res. 13, 1307 (1998).Google Scholar
5. Nix, W. D., Scripta Mater. 39, 545 (1998).Google Scholar
6. Dehm, G., Weiss, D. and Arzt, E., Mater. Sci. Engng. A 309, 468 (2001).Google Scholar
7. Legros, M., Hemker, K. J., Gouldstone, A., Suresh, S., Keller-Flaig, R.-M. and Arzt, E., Acta Mater. 50, 3435 (2002).Google Scholar
8. Phillips, R., Crystals, Defects and Microstructures – Modeling Across Scales, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001, p. 206.Google Scholar
9. Arzt, E., Dehm, G., Gumbsch, P., Kraft, O. and Weiss, D., Prog. Mater. Sci. 46, 283 (2001).Google Scholar
10. Kraft, O., Freund, L. B., Phillips, R. and Arzt, E., MRS Bulletin 27(1), 30 (2002).Google Scholar