Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T16:28:56.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Carbon Foams with Special Electromagnetic Loss Characteristics and Broad Absorbing Band

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2019

Zhigang Fang
Affiliation:
College of Mechanical Engineering, Taizhou University, Taizhou, 318000, China
Chun Fang
Affiliation:
College of Mechanical Engineering, Taizhou University, Taizhou, 318000, China
Get access

Abstract

Carbon foams with a reticulated macrostructure were prepared by a polymer sponge replication method. The electromagnetic parameters of carbon foams with variable electric conductivity were measured at a frequency of 2450MHz. Compared with the same composition pulverized powders, carbon foams have relatively lower dielectric constant but much larger dielectric loss, and more remarkably, carbon foams have magnetic loss. The microwave absorbing property measurement of carbon foams was also conducted. A relatively broad absorbing band performance has been got for carbon foams, and the absorbing values exceeds 7dB almost in the whole measured frequency range of 4-15GHz, while the frequencies range for absorbing values exceeding 8dB are about 7 GHz for the carbon foam with an electric conductivity of 0.46S/m. It is worthy that the broad absorbing band feature of the carbon foam is obtained without any impedance match design, which indicates carbon foams have a great possibility of being applied as RAMs. The special electromagnetic loss characteristics and prominent radar absorbing properties about carbon foams indicate macrostructure modification is possibly a new and effective way to modulate the electromagnetic properties of RAMs besides the traditional composition variation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Seo, II S., Chin, W. S. and Lee, D. G., Compos. Struct. 66, 533542 (2004).Google Scholar
2. Park, K. Y., Lee, S. E., Kim, C. G. and Han, J. H., Compos. Sci. Technol. 66, 576584 (2006).Google Scholar
3. Oh, J. H., Oh, K. S., Kim, C. G. and Hong, C. S., Compos.: Part B-Eng. 35, 4956 (2004).Google Scholar
4. Yang, J., Shen, Z. M. and Hao, Z. B., Carbon 42, 18821885 (2004).Google Scholar
5. Fang, Z. G., Cao, X. M., Li, C. S., Zhang, J. S., Zhang, H. T. and Zhang, H. Y., Carbon 44, 3368- 3370 (2006).Google Scholar
6. Zhang, H. T., Zhang, J. S. and Zhan, H. Y., Comp. Mater. Sci. 38, 857864 (2007).Google Scholar
7. Inagaki, M., Morishita, T., Kuno, A., Kito, T., Hirano, M. and Suwa, T., Carbon 42, 497502 (2004).Google Scholar
8. Sheen, J., Measurement 37, 123130 (2005).Google Scholar
9. Marchant, S., Jones, F. R., Wong, T. P. C. and Wright, P. V., Synth. Met. 96, 3541 (1998).Google Scholar
10. Maslovski, S., Ikonen, P., Kolmakov, I. and Tretyakov, S., “Artificial magneticmaterials based on the new magnetic particle: Metasolenoid,” Progress In Electromagnetics Research(PIER). (New York: Academic, 2005) pp. 6181.Google Scholar
11. Pendty, J. B., Holden, A. J., Robbins, D. J., and Stewart, W. J., IEEE Transactions on MTT. 47, 20752084 (1999).Google Scholar
12. Kagotania, T., Fujiwaraa, D., Sugimotoa, S., Inomataa, K. and Homma, M., J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 272-276, e1813-e1815 (2004).Google Scholar
13. Wang, G. Q., Chen, X. D., Duan, Y. P. and Liu, S. H., J. Alloy. Compd. 454, 340346 (2008).Google Scholar