Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T12:29:22.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cellular Adhesion and Spreading of Endothelial Cells Monitored in Real Time Using the Quartz Crystal Microbalance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Tiean Zhou
Affiliation:
Center for Intelligent Biomaterials Biological Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Lowell, MA 01854
Susan J. Braunhut
Affiliation:
Biological Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Lowell, MA 01854
Diane Medeiros
Affiliation:
Biological Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Lowell, MA 01854
Kenneth A. Marx
Affiliation:
Center for Intelligent Biomaterials Biological Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Lowell, MA 01854
Get access

Abstract

We have applied the Quartz Crystal Microbalance (QCM) technique to continuously record the processes of endothelial cell (EC) adhesion, spreading and cellular mass distribution changes during initial cell to surface contact and homeostatic attachment. ECs (50,000) were layered onto a set volume of media in the QCM device and simultaneously in a mock cell used for photomicroscopy. As cells were observed in the mock cell device to contact and attach to the surface over 45-55 min, we measured in the QCM device a continuous decrease in frequency and continuous increase in resistance, achieving a maximum at about one hr (1400 Ω frequency change and 1400 Ω motional resistance change). These frequency and resistance values stabilized over the next 24 hrs and were unchanged out to 72 hr by QCM measurement (to ∼700 Hz, ∼700 Ω), as the cells were observed to spread in the mock device. Both bovine aortic (BAE) and bovine capillary (BCE) endothelial cells were studied and found to exhibit similar behavior. These studies demonstrate that QCM can be used to detect continuous changes in cell mass and viscoelastic behavior.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Sauerbrey, G., Z. Phys. 155, 206222 (1959).Google Scholar
2. Butty, D. A. and Ward, M. D., Chem. Rev. 92, 13551379 (1992).Google Scholar
3. Maratsugu, M., Kurosawa, S. and Kamo, N., Anal. Chem. 64, 24832487 (1992).Google Scholar
4. Ghouechian, H. O., Kamo, N., Hosokawa, T. and Akitaya, T., Talanta 41, 401406 (1994).Google Scholar
5. Si, S. H., Zhou, T., Liu, D. Z., Nie, L., Yao, S., Analytical Letters 27, 20272037 (1994).Google Scholar
6. Ito, K., Hashimoto, K. and Ishimori, Y., Anal. Chim. Acta 327, 2935 (1996).Google Scholar
7. Su, H., Williams, P. and Thompson, M., Anal. Chem. 67, 10101013 (1995).Google Scholar
8. Matsuda, T., Kishida, A., Ebato, H., Okahada, Y., ASAIO Journal 38, M171–M173 (1992).Google Scholar
9. Roedepening, J., Schlesinger, T. K., Mechalke, E. J., Puleo, D. A., Bizios, R., Anal. Chem. 65, 33783381 (1993).Google Scholar
10. Gryte, D. M., Ward, M. D., Hu, W. S.., Biotechnol. Prog. 9, 105108 (1993).Google Scholar
11. Janshoff, A., Wegener, J., Sieber, M., Galla, H. J., Eur. Biophys. J. 25, 93103 (1996).Google Scholar
12. Goldsmith, H. L., Karino, T., in Endothelial Cells, edited by Ryan, U. S. (CRC Press, 1988), p. 139171.Google Scholar
13. Nerem, R. M., Alexander, R. W., Chappell, D. C., Medford, R. M., Varner, S. E., Taylor, W. R., Am. J. Med. Sci. 316(3), 169175 (1998).Google Scholar
14. Engerman, R. L., Pfaffenbach, D., Davis, M. D., Lab. Invest. 17, 738741 (1967).Google Scholar
15. Kumar, R., Filder, I. J., In Vivo 12(1), 2734 (1998).Google Scholar
16. Braunhut, S. J., Palomares, M., Microvascular Res. 41, 4762 (1991).Google Scholar
17. Muramatsu, H., Egawa, A., Ataka, T., J. Electroanal. Chem. 388, 8992 (1995).Google Scholar