Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T16:32:47.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characterization of a Thick Homoepitaxial CVD Diamond Film

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

M. A. Plano
Affiliation:
Crystallume, Menlo Park, CA 94025
M. D. Moyer
Affiliation:
Crystallume, Menlo Park, CA 94025
M. M. Moreno
Affiliation:
Crystallume, Menlo Park, CA 94025
D. Black
Affiliation:
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD
H. Burdette
Affiliation:
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD
L. Robins
Affiliation:
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD
L. S. Pan
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA
D. R. Kania
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA
W. Banholzer
Affiliation:
G. E. Superabrasives, Worthington, OH
Get access

Abstract

A thick homoepitaxial CVD diamond film was grown on a large high temperature, high pressure (HTHP) Ha diamond to study the defects present in the CVD film. The HTHP diamond had dimensions of 6 mm x 6 mm x 0.44 mm. The thickness of the diamond was increased to 0.84 mm by microwave plasma CVD. X-ray topographs were taken before and after growth to compare the defects in CVD diamond to those in the HTHP diamond. Prior to growth the substrate was unstrained and the characteristic microstructure of stacking faults and dislocations was observed. There was also a surface relief, visible optically, on the substrate of lines along the [100] which are probably due to polishing. After deposition of the CVD film, the crystal was strained with the film in tension. The defect structure observed throughout the CVD film followed the surface relief of the substrate. Cathodoluminescence spectra indicate that the film contains nitrogen defect complexes which are not present in the substrate. Cathodoluminescence also indicates that there are more non-radiative recombination centers in the film than in the substrate. Electrical results from transient photoconductivity measurements indicate that while the mobilities of the film and the substrate are comparable, the lifetime is much shorter in the film, possibly reflecting the higher concentration of non-radiative recombination centers.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Landstrass, M. I., Piano, M. A., McWilliams, S., Moreno, M.A., Kania, D.R., Pan, L.S., Han, S. and Flemish, J. R., Proc. of Third Int. Symposium on Diamond Materials, ECS, 920 (1993).Google Scholar
2. Tanner, B.K., X-Ray Diffraction Topography (Paragammon Press, New York, 1976).Google Scholar
3. Wentorf, R. H., J. of Phys. Chem. 75, 1833 (1971).Google Scholar
4. Strong, H. M. and Wentorf, R. H., Am. J. Phys. 59, 1005 (1991).Google Scholar
5. Kamo, M., Sato, Y., Matsumoto, S., Setaka, N., J. Cryst. Growth 62, 642 (1983).Google Scholar
6. Pan, L. S., Kania, D.R., Han, S., Ager, J. W. II, Landstrass, M.I., Landen, O. L. and Pianetta, P., Science 255, 830 (1992).Google Scholar
7. Ruan, J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 60, 3138 (1992).Google Scholar
8. Collins, A. T., J. Phys. Condensed Matter 1, 4029 (1989).Google Scholar