Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g7rbq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T12:06:37.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chemical Composition and Morphology of Titanium Surface Oxides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

J. Lausmaa
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Chalmers University of Technology, S-412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden
L. Mattsson
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Chalmers University of Technology, S-412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden
U. Rolander
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Chalmers University of Technology, S-412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden
B. Kasemo
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Chalmers University of Technology, S-412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden
Get access

Abstract

Titanium has emerged as one of the most tissue-compatible metallic materials. The high degree of biocompatibility is intimately connected with the oxide that forms on the metal surface. In the present work a broad characterization has been made of titanium samples pretreated both by presently used clinical procedures (mechanical machining, ultrasonic cleaning and autoclaving) and by alternative preparation procedures such as electropolishing and anodic oxidation. The former samples are found to have a surface oxide of TiO2 which is 30–50 Å thick, with some trace element contamination and a relatively large carbon content (30–50 % of a monoatomic layer). The anodically oxidized samples also consist of TiO2 with an oxide thickness range of 50–2000 Å, but the morphology and crystallinity of the anodic oxides are found to depend on thickness and preparation conditions.

The main methods of investigation used in the present study were ESCA, SIMS and transmission electron microscopy.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Bränemark, P-I., in Tissue Integrated Prostheses, Osseointegration in Clinical Densitry, edited by Bränemark, P-I., Zarb, G.A. and Albrektsson, T. (Quintessence, Chicago, 1985), ch. 1.Google Scholar
2. Williams, D.F., in Biocompatibility of Clinical Implant Materials, edited by Williams, D.F., (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1981) ch. 2.Google Scholar
3. Steinemann, S.G., in Evaluation of Biomaterials, edited by Winter, G.D., Leray, J.L. and de Groot, K., (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1980) p. 1.Google Scholar
4. Kasemo, B., J. Prosth Dent. 49, 832 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Albrektsson, et al. , Ann. Biomed. Eng. 11, 1 (1983)Google Scholar
6. Kasemo, B. and Lausmaa, J., in Tissue Integrated Prostheses, Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry, edited by Brånemark, P-I., Zarb, G.A. and Albrektsson, T. (Quintessence, Chicago, 1985) ch. 4; CRC Crit. Rev. Biocomp. (in press)Google Scholar
7. Bjursten, L.M. et al. , in Oral Interfacial Reactions of Bone, Soft Tissue and Saliva, edited by Glantz, P-O., Leach, S.A. and Ericsson, T., (IRL Press. Oxford, 1985) p. 139.Google Scholar
8. Rolander, U., Mattsson, L., Lausmaa, J. and Kasemo, B., (to be published)Google Scholar
9. Lausmaa, J., Kasemo, B., Mattsson, H. and Odelius, H., (to be published)Google Scholar
10. Lausmaa, J., Kasemo, B. and Hansson, S., Biomaterials 6, 23 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Aladjem, A., J. Mater Sci. 8, 688 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Olier, R., Clechet, P., Martelet, C. and Martin, J.R., J. Less Comm. Met. 69, 73 (1980)Google Scholar
13. Gandon, J. and Joud, J.C., J. Less Comm. Met. 69, 277 (1980)Google Scholar