Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-24T05:31:44.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

CMP Fundamentals and Challenges

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Michael R. Oliver*
Affiliation:
Rodel, Inc., Phoenix, AZ
Get access

Abstract

Chemical Mechanical Polishing (CMP) as a semiconductor polishing technology has grown dramatically during the past decade. It has been a key enabling technology, facilitating the development of high density multilevel interconnects. Its widespread application has exceeded the growth of the scientific understanding.

Models for silicon dioxide polishing mechanisms have built upon the work originally done for glass polishing. Recent work has augmented our insight, but our understanding is far from complete. A quantitative picture of the basic interaction mechanisms for silicon dioxide polishing does not yet exist. The models for metal polishing are now an active area of investigation. Recent work has demonstrated that more work is need to adequate explain the CMP of metals. The metal CMP mechanisms appear to be substantially more complex than originally assumed.

The challenges for CMP have been to improve the performance of the technology, and increasingly this needs a foundation of scientific understanding to achieve the needed gains. We can expect that, as the scientific foundation grows, it will contribute significantly to manufacturing improvements as has been the case in other areas of semiconductor technology.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Zhao, B. and Shi, F. G., Proceedings of Chemical-MechanicalP lanarizationfor ULSI Multilevel Interconnect Conference, p. 13, 1999, and references contained therein.Google Scholar
2. Cook, L. M., Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids 120, p. 152 (1990).10.1016/0022-3093(90)90200-6Google Scholar
3. Brown, N. and Cook, L. M., Paper TuB-A4, Tech. Digest, Topical Meeting on the Science of Polishing, Optical Society of America, April 17, 1984.Google Scholar
4. Runnels, S., Journal of Electronic Materials 25, p. 1574 (1996).10.1007/BF02655578Google Scholar
5. Ouma, D., Boning, D., Chung, J., Shinn, G., Olsen, L., and Clark, J., Proceedings of the International Interconnect Technology Conference, p. 67, 1998 Google Scholar
6. Kaufman, F. B., Thompson, D. B., Broadie, R. E., Jaso, M. A., Guthrie, W. L., Pearson, D. J., and Small, M. B., Journal of the Electrochemical Society 138, p. 3460 (1991).10.1149/1.2085434Google Scholar
7. Stein, D. J., Hetherington, D. L., and Cecchi, J. L., Journal of the Electrochemical Society, accepted to be published in 1999.Google Scholar
8. Joseph Steigerwald, M., Murarka, Shyam P., and Gutmann, Ronald J., Chemical Mechanical Planarization of Microelectronic Materials, Wiley, New York, 1997.10.1002/9783527617746Google Scholar
9. Cook, L. M. and Wu, G. W., Proceedings of the Chemical MechanicalP lanarizationfor ULSI Multilevel Interconnect Conference, p. 150, 1998.Google Scholar
10. Levert, J. A., Mess, S. M., Salant, R. F., Danyluk, S., and Baker, A. R., Tribology Transactions 41, p. 593 (1998).10.1080/10402009808983787Google Scholar
11. Coppeta, J., Rogers, C., Racz, L. C., Philipossian, A., and Kaufinann, F. B., Proceedings of the Chemical Mechanical Planaraization for ULSI Multilevel Interconnect Conference, p. 37, 1999.Google Scholar
12. Baker, A. R., Proceedingso f ChemicalM echanical Planarization for ULSI Multilevel Interconnect Conference, p. 339, 1997.Google Scholar