Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-tsvsl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T05:26:41.825Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Compliant Substrates With an Embedded Twist Boundary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Y. H. Lo
Affiliation:
School of Electrical Engineering Cornell University Ithaca, NY 14853yhlo@ee.cornell.edu
Z. H. Zhu
Affiliation:
School of Electrical Engineering Cornell University Ithaca, NY 14853
Get access

Abstract

In this article, we propose a new model to explain how heteroepitaxial layers grown on a twist-bonded thin layer may have a significantly reduced number of threading dislocations even if the strain in the epitaxial layers is relaxed. We first point out the deficiency in the existing compliant substrate theory by showing that all the synthesized “compliant substrates” fail to behave as “ideal” free-standing templates assumed by the current theory. Our new model is constructed on the base of stress field interactions between the heteroepitaxial layer and the embedded twist boundary. In the new model, the reduction in threading dislocation density originates from the extension of the dislocation half loops due to the effect of misfit dislocation pinning by the twist boundary. When the average size of the dislocation half loops increases substantially from micrometers to millimeters or even to the size of the wafer, the density of threading dislocations drops significantly. This model does not require any “macroscopic” motion between the bonded thin layer and the handle wafer as the current theory does, which makes it more agreeable with the experimental results

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Ejeckam, F. E., Lo, Y. H., Subramanian, S., Hou, H. Q., Hammons, B. E., Appl. Phys. Lett., Vol. 70, no. 10, 1997.Google Scholar
[2] Ejeckam, F. E., Seaford, M. L., Lo, Y. H., Hou, H. Q., Hammons, B. E., Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 71, pp. 776778, 1997.Google Scholar
[3] Zhu, Z. H., Zhou, R., Lo, Y. H., Hou, H., Hammons, B. E., to be published in Applied Physics Letters.Google Scholar
[4] Lo, Y. H., Appl. Phys. Lett., Vol. 59, p. 2311, 1991.Google Scholar
[5] Teng, D. and Lo, Y. H., Appl. Phys. Lett., Vol. 62, p. 43, 1993.Google Scholar
[6] Freund, L. B. and Nix, W. D., Appl. Phys. Lett., 69(2), p. 173, 1996.Google Scholar
[7] Freund, L. B. and Nix, W. D., Workshp on Bonded and Compliant Substrates, San Juan, Puerto Rico, Feb. 1-5, 1998 Google Scholar