Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-l82ql Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T13:21:24.039Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Corrosion of Nuclear Fuel Inside a Failed Copper Nuclear Waste Container

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2011

Michael Broczkowski ,
Jonathan S Goldik ,
Billy G Santos ,
James J Noel  and
David Shoesmith
Michael Broczkowski
Affiliation:
mbroczko@uwo.ca, University of Western Ontario, London,ON, N6A 5B7, Canada
Jonathan S Goldik
Affiliation:
jsgoldik@uwo.ca, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, N6A 5B7, Canada
Billy G Santos
Affiliation:
bgsantos@uwo.ca, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, N6A 5B7, Canada
James J Noel
Affiliation:
jjnoel@uwo.ca, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, N6A 5B7, Canada
David Shoesmith
Affiliation:
dwshoesm@uwo.ca, University of Western Ontario, Chemistry, Chemistry Building, London, N6A 5B7, Canada
Get access

Abstract

Canada's Nuclear Waste Management Organization has recommended to the Canadian federal government an adaptive phased management approach to the long-term management of used nuclear fuel. This approach includes isolation in a deep geologic repository. In such a repository, the fuel would be sealed inside a carbon steel-lined copper container. To assist the development of performance assessment models studies of fuel behaviour inside a failed waste container are underway. Using an iterative modeling and experimental approach, the important features and processes that determine fuel behaviour have been identified and studied. These features and processes are discussed and the results of studies to elucidate specific mechanisms and determine important parameter values summarized.

Keywords

waste managementcorrosionkinetics
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 985: Symposium NN – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXX , 2006 , 0985-NN01-01
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Nuclear Waste Management Organization (NWMO). Choosing A Way Forward: The Future Management of Canada's Used Nuclear Fuel. November 2005 (www.nwmo.ca).Google Scholar
2. King, F. and Kolar, M., Ontario Power Generation Report: 06819–REP–01200–10041– ROO (2000).Google Scholar
3. Johnson, L. H., LeNeveu, D. M., King, F., Shoesmith, D. W., Kolar, M., Oscarson, D. W., Sunder, S., Onofrei, C. and Crosthwaite, J. L., Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Report.: AECL–11494–2, COG–95–552–2 (1996).Google Scholar
4. McMurry, J., Dixon, D. A., Garroni, J.D., Ikeda, B.M., Stroes-Gascoyne, S., Baumgartner, P. and Melnyk, T. W., Ontario Power Generation Report No.: 06819–REP 01200–10092– ROO (2003).Google Scholar
5. King, F. and Kolar, M., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 412, 547 (1996).Google Scholar
6. Sunder, S., Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Report.: AECL–11380, COG–95–340 (1995).Google Scholar
7. Shoesmith, D. W., Kolar, M. and King, F., Corrosion. 59, 802 (2003).Google Scholar
8. Gierszewski, P. J., Russell, S. B., D'Andrea, A., Garisto, F., Hobbs, M., Jensen, M. R., Kempe, T. F., Maak, P., Simmons, G. R. and Vorauer, A., Ontario Power Generation Report No.: 06819–REP–01200–10129–ROO (2004).Google Scholar
9. Shoesmith, D. W., Noël, J. J., Qin, Z., Lee, C. T., Goldik, J. S., Santos, B. G. and Broczkowski, M. E., Ontario Power Generation Report No.: 06819-REP-01200-10145-ROO (2005).Google Scholar
10. Santos, B. G., Nesbitt, H. W., Noël, J. J. and Shoesmith, D. W., Electrochimica Acta. 49, 1863 (2004).Google Scholar
11. Grenthe, , Fuger, J., Konings, R. J., Lemire, R. J., Muller, A. B. Nguyen–Trung, C. and Wanner, H., Electrochimica Acta. 51, 4157 (2006).Google Scholar
12. Santos, B. G., Noel, J. J. and Shoesmith, D. W., J. Nucl. Mater. 350, 320 (2006).Google Scholar
13. Shoesmith, D. W., J. Nucl. Mater. 282, 1 (2000).Google Scholar
14. Pablo, J. de, Casas, I., Jimenez, J., Molera, M., Rovira, M., Duro, L. and Bruno, J., Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 63, 3097 (1999).Google Scholar
15. Illin, S. R., Spahiu, K. and Eklund, U–B., J. Nucl. Mater. 297, 231 (2001).Google Scholar
16. Cobos, J., Wiss, T., Gouder, T. and Rondinella, V. V., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 757, 365 (2003).Google Scholar
17. Pablo, J. de, Casas, I., Clarens, F., Aamrani, F. El and Rovira, M., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 663, 409 (2001).Google Scholar
18. Wilson, C. N. and Gray, W. J., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 176, 489 (1990).Google Scholar
19. Tait, J. C. and Luht, J. M. L., Ontario Hydro Report No.: 06819–REP–01200–006–ROO (1997).Google Scholar
20. Shoesmith, D. W., Luht, J. L. M. and Sunder, S., Ontario Power Generation Report No.: 06189–REP–01200–10048–ROO (2000).Google Scholar
21. Santos, B. G., Noël, J. J. and Shoesmith, D. W., Corrosion Science. 48, 3852 (2006).Google Scholar
22. Buck, E. C., Finn, P. A. and Bates, J. K., Micron. 35, 235 (2004).Google Scholar
23. Burns, P. C., Ewing, R. C. and Miller, M. L., J. Nucl. Mater. 245, 1 (1997).Google Scholar
24. Buck, E. C., Finch, R. J., Finn, P. A. and Bates, J. K., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 506, 87 (1998).Google Scholar
25. Finch, R. J., Fortner, J. H., Buck, E. C. and Wolf, S. F., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 713, 647 (2002).Google Scholar
26. Goldik, J. S., Noël, J. J. and Shoesmith, D. W., J. Electroanal. Chem. 582, 241 (2005).Google Scholar
27. Goldik, J. S., Noël, J. J. and Shoesmith, D. W., Electrochimica Acta. 51, 3278 (2006).Google Scholar
28. Goldik, J. S., Noël, J. J. and Shoesmith, D. W., J. Electrochem. Soc. 153, E151 (2006).Google Scholar
29. Goldik, J. S., Nesbitt, H. W., Noël, J. J. and Shoesmith, D. W., Electrochimica Acta. 49, 1699 (2004).Google Scholar
30. Wren, J. C., Shoesmith, D. W. and Sunder, S., J. Electrochem. Soc. 152, B470 (2005).Google Scholar
31. King, F. and Stroes–Gascoyne, S., Ontario Power Generation Report No.: 06819–REP– 01300-10019 (2000).Google Scholar
32. Loida, Grambow, B. and Geckeis, H., J. Nucl. Mater. 238, 11 (1996).Google Scholar
33. Gimenez, J., Baraj, E., Torrero, M. E., Casas, I. and de Pablo, J., J. Nucl. Mater. 238, 64 (1996).Google Scholar
34. Spahiu, K., Werme, L. and U–Eklund, B., Radiochimica Acta. 88, 507 (2000).Google Scholar
35. Rollin, S., Spahiu, K. and U–Eklund, B., J. Nucl. Mater. 297, 231 (2001).Google Scholar
36. Sunder, S., Boyer, G. D. and Miller, N. H., J. Nucl. Mater. 175, 163 (1990).Google Scholar
37. King, F., Quinn, M. J. and Miller, N. H., Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Company Report, SKB–TR–99–27 (1999).Google Scholar
38. Broczkowski, M. E., Noël, J. J. and Shoesmith, D. W., J. Nucl. Mater. 346, 16 (2005).Google Scholar
39. Broczkowski, M. E., Zhu, R., Ding, Z., Noël, J. J. and Shoesmith, D. W., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 932, 449 (2005)Google Scholar
40. Broczkowski, M. E., Noël, J. J. and Shoesmith, D. W., J. Electroanal. Chem. 602, 8 (2007).Google Scholar