Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-lrf7s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T23:21:54.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Creep Properties and Interfacial Microstructure of SiC Whisker Reinforced Si3N4

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Håkan A. Swan
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Chalmers University of Technology, S-412 96 Goteborg, Sweden
Colette O'meara
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Chalmers University of Technology, S-412 96 Goteborg, Sweden
Get access

Abstract

Preliminary creep tests were performed on SiC whisker reinforced and matrix Si3N4 material fabricated by the NPS technique. The material was extensively crystallised in the as received material, leaving only thin amorphous films surrounding the grains. No improvement in the creep resistance could be detected for the whisker reinforced material. The deformation mechanisms were found to be that of cavitation in the form of microcracks, predominantly at the whisker/matrix interfaces, and the formation of larger cracks. Extensive oxidation of the samples, as a result of high temperature exposure to air, was observed for the materials tested at 1375°C.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Becher, P.F., Hsueh, C.H., Angelini, P. and Tiegs, T.N., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 71.. (12), 1050–61 (1988).Google Scholar
2. Swan, A.H., Olsson, E., Lundberg, R. and Dunlop, G.L., presented at the iiB-89 Conference, Paris, France, 1989 (to be published).Google Scholar
3. Porter, J.R., Lange, F.F. and Chokshi, A.H., in Processing and Creep Performance of Silicon Carbide Whisker-Reinforved Silicon Nitride. edited by Becher, P.F, Swain, M.V., and Sõmiya, S. (Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 78, Pittsburgh, PA 1987) pp. 289294.Google Scholar
4. Backhaus-Ricoult, M., Castaing, J. and Routbort, J.L., Rev. Phys. Appl. 23, 239249 (1988).Google Scholar
5. Evans, A.G. and Blumenthal, W., in Fracture Mechanics of Ceramics, edited by Bradt, R.C., Evans, A.G., Hasselman, D.P.H. and Lange, F.F. (Plenum, New York, 1983) 6, pp. 423448.Google Scholar
6. Clarke, D.R., in Progress in Nitrogen Ceramics, edited by Riley, F.L. (Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, 1983) pp. 341358.Google Scholar
7. Pompe, R., Hermansson, L. and Carlsson, R., Sprechsaal, 115 1098 (1982).Google Scholar
8. Hollenberg, G.W., Terwillinger, G.R. and Gordon, R.S., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 54, 196 (1971).Google Scholar
9. Evans, R.W., Murakami, T. and Wilshire, B., Br. Ceram. Trans. J. 87 (2), 5457 (1988).Google Scholar
10. Fett, T., Keller, K. and Munz, D., J. Mater. Sci. 23, 467 (1988).Google Scholar