Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T09:24:22.128Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Crush Absorbing Energy of White Spot Lesion Measured by Indentation Tests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Alison M. Fallgatter ,
Ching-Chang Ko  and
C-H Chou
Alison M. Fallgatter
Affiliation:
fall0037@umn.edu, University of Minnesota, Developmental and Surgical Sciences, United States
Ching-Chang Ko
Affiliation:
koxxx007@umn.edu, University of Minnesota, Diagnostic and Biological Sciences, United States
C-H Chou
Affiliation:
koxxx007@umn.edu, Foxconn Electronics, Inc. 1688 Richard Avenue, Santa Clara, CA 95050
Get access

Abstract

White spot lesions are clinically detectable areas of demineralized enamel that often form during orthodontic treatment. Fluoride has been shown to prevent demineralization from occurring. Mechanical properties of white spot lesions are not well characterized. Bovine enamel slabs, with and without fluoride treatment, were placed under demineralization conditions. Through a series of microindentations at incremental loads, mechanical strength was measured using a novel method, SVAE. Specific Volume Absorbing Energy (SVAE) is equal to work energy divided by the indentation volume. The supra-surface area (outmost 5 μm) of enamel slabs with fluoride demonstrated decreased mechanical strength compared to those without fluoride. Fluoride may not impart protection over long periods of demineralization.

Keywords

tissuestrengthbiomedical
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 898: Symposium L – Mechanical Behavior of Biological and Biomimetic Materials , 2005 , 0898-L04-03-BB01-03
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Zachrisson, B and Zachrisson, S(1971). Caries incidence and orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. Scandinavian Journal of Dental Research 79: 183–192.Google Scholar
2. Chang, H, Walsh, L and Freer, T (1997). Enamel demineralization during orthodontic treatment. Aetiology and prevention. Australian Dental Journal 42:(5): 322–327.Google Scholar
3. Tao, W, Robertson, R, Thornton, P (1993). Effects of Material Poperties and Crush Conditions on the Crush Energy Absorption of Fiber Composite Rods. Composites Science and Technology 47: 405–418.Google Scholar
4. ten Cate, JM, Duijsters, PP (1983a). Influence of fluoride in solution on tooth demineralization. I. Chemical data. Caries Res 17:193–199.Google Scholar
5. Caldwell, R. C., Gilmore, R. W., Timberlake, P., Pigman, J., Pigman, W (1958). Semiquantitative Studies of In Vitro Caries by Microhardness Tests. Journal of Dental Research. 37(2): 301–305.Google Scholar
6. Stookey, GK (1996) Early detection of dental caries. Indiana University School of Dentistry.Google Scholar
7. Arends, J, ten Bosch, JJ (1986). In vivo de- and remineralization of dental enamel. In: Factors Relating to Demineralisation and Remineralisation of the Teeth. Leach, SA, editor. Osford, England: IRL Press Limited, pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
8. Featherstone, JD, ten Cate, JM, Shariati, M, Arends, J (1983). Comparison of artificial caries-like lesions by quantitative microradiography and microhardness profiles. Caries Res 17: 385–391.Google Scholar