Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-lrf7s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T07:21:41.485Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Design and Simulation of High Efficiency Silicon Light-Emitting Diodes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Grant Z. Pan
Affiliation:
gzpan@ee.ucla.edu, UCLA, Microfabrication Laboratory/EE, 420 WESTWOOD PLAZA, LOS ANGELES, CA, 90095, United States, 310 825 4593, 310 267 5277
Jaime Peretzman
Affiliation:
peretzman@gmail.com, University of California at Los Angeles, Microfabrication Laboratory, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, United States
Dae H. Pak
Affiliation:
santana97@ucla.edu, University of California at Los Angeles, Microfabrication Laboratory, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, United States
Li P. Ren
Affiliation:
lpren@globalnanosystems.com, Global Nanosystems, Inc., Nanoelectronics and Nanophotonics Laboratory, Los Angeles, CA, 90025, United States
Get access

Abstract

Four boron-implanted p-n junction silicon light-emitting diode structures were designed and simulated under an identical process flow by using Silvaco simulators. In the simulation, only boron-implant parameters and post-implant anneal conditions were varied to identify and compare the physical, electrical, and optical properties of the structures. It was found that a pillar structure with a wrapped p-n junction has the greatest radiative recombination rate. Regardless the structure type, the maximum radiative recombination rate always occurs within the p+ region. There exists a peak in the maximum radiative recombination rate when the anneal temperature increases from 700 to 1100 °C, and the anneal temperature at peak increases while the implant dose increases. Furthermore, the radiative recombination rate always increases with the implant dose but it saturates at a high dose. However, the radiative recombination rate does not change significantly with the implant energy.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ng, W.L., Lourenco, M.A., Gwilliam, R.M., Ledain, S., Shao, G., and Homewood, K.P., Nature 410 (2001) 192.Google Scholar
2. Kittler, M., Arguirov, T., Fischer, A., and Seifert, W., Opt. Mater. 27 (2005) 967.Google Scholar
3. Pan, G.Z., Ostroumov, R.P., Lian, Y.G., Tu, K.N., and Wang, K.L., IEDM Tech. Digest (2004), pp. 343–34Google Scholar
4. Schreiber, H.-U., Electrochem. Sol.-Stat. Lett. 10 (2007) H3133.Google Scholar
5. Sobolev, N. A., Emerl'yanov, A. M., Shek, E.I., and Vdovin, V. I., Sol.Stat. Phenom. 95-96 (2004) 283.Google Scholar
6. Lourenco, M. A., Siddiqui, M.S.A., Gwilliam, R. M., Shao, G., and Homewood, K. P., Physica E16 (2003) 376.Google Scholar