Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-l4ctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-07T06:19:40.547Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Diffusion Mechanisms of Molecules on Structured Surfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Marvin Silverberg*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical & Biological Sciences, Oregon Graduate Institute of Science & Technology, 19600 N.W. von Neumann Drive, Beaverton, OR 97006-1999
Get access

Abstract

The diffusion of ethane and n-pentane on metallic surfaces is studied by molecular dynamics simulations. On atomically smooth, faced centered cubic (111) crystal surfaces, n-pentane has several conformational states, each of which diffuses at a different rate. Diffusion barriers are distinct from intramolecular conformational isomerization barriers. Weak friction is observed. Hopping diffusion occurs near the diffusion threshold. As the temperature is raised, correlated barrier crossing and recrossing increases. n-Pentane slides, transverse to its axis, without changing its orientation with respect to the surface. Conformational changes occur on a longer time scale than diffusional barrier crossing and are restricted by the surface. Far above the diffusion threshold temperature, partial molecular desorption occurs and conformational isomerization is less restricted. The molecules slide, roll and tumble continuously across the surface. A similar pattern of temperature-dependent change in diffusion mechanisms occurs in ethane but without conformational changes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. George, S. M., DeSantolo, A. M., and Hall, R. B., Surf. Sci. 159, L425 (1985); C. H. Mak, J. L. Brand, A. A. Deckert, and S. M. George, J. Chem. Phys. 85, 1676 (1986); C. H. Mak, B. G. Koehler, J. L. Brand, and S. M. George, J. Chem. Phys. 87, 2340 (1987); C. H. Mak, J. L. Brand, B. G. Koehler, and S. M. George, Surf. Sci. 191, 108 (1987); C. H. Mak, B. G. Koehler, and S. M. George, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 6, 856 (1988); E. D. Westre, M. V. Arena, A. A. Deckert, J. L. Brand, and S. M. George, J. Chem. Phys. 94, 293 (1990).Google Scholar
2. Gomer, R., Rep. Prog. Phys. 53, 917 (1990), and references therein.Google Scholar
3. Trayanov, A. L. and Prisant, M. G., J. Chem. Phys. 94, 2352 (1991).Google Scholar
4. Silverberg, M., submitted to J. Chem. Phys.Google Scholar
5. Silverberg, M. and Prisant, M. G., in preparation.Google Scholar
6. van der Ploeg, P. and Berendsen, H. J. C., Molec. Phys. 49, 233 (1983).Google Scholar
7. Ryckaert, J. P. and Bellemans, A., Faraday Discuss. Chem. Soc. 66, 95 (1978).Google Scholar
8. Leggetter, S. and Tildesley, D. J., Molec. Phys. 68, 519 (1989); S. Leggetter and D. J Tildesley, Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 94, 285 (1990).Google Scholar