Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-5pczc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T05:31:55.655Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dynamics of Laser Ablation and Vaporization of PbZr0.54Ti0.66O3: Laser Fluence and Ambient Gas Effects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

R.E. Leuchtner
Affiliation:
Office of Naval Technology Postdoctoral Research Associate
J.S. Horwitz
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC. 20375-5000
D.B. Chrisey
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC. 20375-5000
Get access

Abstract

A systematic study of the gas phase products observed from the pulsed laser vaporization of a PbZro.54Ti0.46O3 target was performed as a function of laser fluence and ambient gas pressure. At low fluences, ≤0.3 J/cm2, only Pb and PbO were observed, while at higher fluences, between 0.3 - 1.3 J/cm2, neutral atomic species Pb, Zr, and Ti were detected. Small oxide molecules and atomicions were also observed. These regimes are associated with two ejection mechanisms: thermal evaporation and ablation, respectively. No direct evidence of chemical reactions was found over the gas pressure range explored (0-5 mTorr). Within the 25 cm reaction cell distance however, the addition of both inert and reactive gases greatly changed the velocity distributions of the ejected species. The decrease in velocity (energy) as a function of gas pressure was due to physical scattering and could be modeled as a pseudo-first order bimolecular collision process. The scattering rate increased linearly with the physical cross-section of the background gas and was independent of the kinetic energy of the ablated species.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Smith, H.M. and Turner, A.F., Appl. Opt. 4, 147 (1965).Google Scholar
2. Cheung, J. and Sankur, H., CRC Crit. Rev. Solid State Mater. Sci., 15 63 (1988).Google Scholar
3. Newman, H.S., Chrisey, D.B., Horwitz, J.S., Weaver, B.D., and Reeves, M.E., IEEE Trans. Magnetics, 22,7 2540 (1991).Google Scholar
4. Scott, J.F. and Araujo, C.A. Paz de, Science 246, 1400 (1989).Google Scholar
5. Kidoh, H., Ogawa, T., Morimoto, A., and Shimizu, T., Appl. Phys. Lett. 58 2910 (1991).Google Scholar
6. Chrisey, D.B., Horwitz, J.S., and Grabowski, K.S., in Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings vol. 191, p.25, Paine, D.C. and Bravman, J.C., eds. 1990.Google Scholar
7. Horwitz, J.S., Grabowski, K.S., Chrisey, D.B., and Leuchtner, R.E., Appl. Phys., 59 1565 (1991).Google Scholar
8. Leuchtner, R.E., Grabowski, K.S., Chrisey, D.B., and Horwitz, J.S., Ferroelectrics, in press, 1992.Google Scholar
9. Chrisey, D.B., Horwitz, J.S., and Leuchtner, R.E., Thin Solid Films, 206, 111 (1991).Google Scholar
10. Anderson, J.B. and Fenn, J.B., Phys. Fluids 8, 780 (1965).Google Scholar
11. Anderson, J.B., Molecular Beams and Low Density Gas Dynamics ed. Wegener, P., Dekker, pp. 167, 1974.Google Scholar
12. Leuchtner, R.E., Horwitz, J.S., and Chrisey, D.B., to be published.Google Scholar
13.“Periodic Table of the Elements”, Sargent-Welch Scientific Co., # S18806, Skokie, III.Google Scholar