Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-09T12:17:39.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Film Thickness and Cure Temperature on the Mechanical Properties of FOx® Flowable Oxide Thin Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Huey-Chiang Liou
Affiliation:
Dow Coming Corporation, Semiconductor Fabrication Materials KCI, Midland, MI 48686–0994
John Pretzer
Affiliation:
Dow Coming Corporation, Semiconductor Fabrication Materials KCI, Midland, MI 48686–0994
Get access

Abstract

The mechanical properties and thermal stresses of FOx thin films at different thickness and cured at different temperatures have been investigated by a nanoindentor and a profilometer. In this study, the correlation between structure change, thickness, Si-H/Si-O ratio, modulus, hardness, and calculated coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) of FOx films have been established. The results show that the modulus of 400°C cured FOx film decreases with increasing film thickness while the hardness slightly varies with increasing film thickness. The calculated CTE of FOx film increases with increasing film thickness. In addition, both the modulus and hardness of FOx films increase with increasing curing temperature. However, the calculated CTE of FOx film decreases with increasing curing temperature. The Si-H/Si-O ratio increases with increasing film thickness but decreases with increasing curing temperature. These results indicate that the increase in modulus and hardness and the decreases in CTE for FOx films are either due to the remaining of Si-H bonds in FOx film at different film thickness or the conversion of Si-H into Si-O when forming the network structure in the FOx film at higher curing temperatures.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. The National Technology Roadmap for semiconductors, Semiconductor Industry Association, San Jose, CA 1997.Google Scholar
2. Jeng, S. P., et al. In Proceeding of VLSI Symposium, Kyoto, Japan, 1995, pp. 1521.Google Scholar
3. Loboda, M. and Grove, C., J. Electrochem. Soc., 145, 1998, pp. 28612866.10.1149/1.1838726Google Scholar
4. Bremmer, J., Liu, Y., K, Gruszynski, Dall, F., Low-Dielectric Constant Materials and Applications in Microelectronics, Mat. Res. Symp. Proc. 476, 1997, p. 37.Google Scholar
5. Pharr, G.M. and Oliver, W.C.. MRS Bulletin, 2833, 1992.10.1557/S0883769400041634Google Scholar
6. Tong, H. M. and Nguyen, L. T., New Characterization Techniques for Thin Polymer Films, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1990.Google Scholar
7. Liou, H. C. and Pretzer, J., Thin Solid Films, 335, 1999, pp. 186191.10.1016/S0040-6090(98)00881-5Google Scholar
8. Wu, W. L, Liou, H. C., Thin Solid Films, 312, 1998, pp.7983.10.1016/S0040-6090(97)00587-7Google Scholar
9. Riande, E. and Saiz, E., Dipole Moments and Birefringence of Polymers, Prentice Hall Press, Englewood, New Jersey, 1992.Google Scholar
10. Material Data Tables, Goodfellow Catalog 1996, Goodfellow Corporation, Berwyn, PA.Google Scholar