Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-5lx2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T14:34:02.036Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effect of Stress in the PdGe Mediated Solid Phase Epitaxial Growth of Ge on GaAs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

Fabian Radulescu
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Oregon Graduate Institute of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 91000, Portland, Oregon, 97291
John M. McCarthy
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Oregon Graduate Institute of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 91000, Portland, Oregon, 97291
Get access

Abstract

The residual stress and the microstructure associated with it were studied in connection with the Pd-Ge ohmic contact formation on GaAs. Evaporated Pd (20 nm) / Ge (150 nm) / Pd (50 nm) thin film stacks on GaAs were annealed at various temperatures and the resulting microstructures were investigated by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Micro-cantilever beam structures were fabricated with a focused ion beam (FIB) workstation and the residual stress present was calculated from the deflection magnitude. It was found that Ge solid phase epitaxial (SPE) growth on GaAs is associated with a stress relaxation of the thin film system. A new model that suggests the tensile stress induced by the intermediate layer may play an important role in the SPE growth mechanism is proposed. Other cases of solid phase heteroepitaxial growth with an intermediate medium, such as Ge/Au/Si, Co/Ti/Si (the TIME method) and Co/SiOx/Si (the OME method) are discussed in light of this newly proposed model. Also, the possibility of using controlled stress to engineer new methods for growing SPE based heterostructures will be presented.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Lau, S. S. and Wag, W. F. Van der, in “Thin Films-Interdiffusion and Reactions”, edited by Poate, J. M., Tu, K. N. and Mayer, J. W. (Wiley, New York, 1978), p. 433.Google Scholar
2. Hellman, O., Mater. Sci. Rev. R16, 1 (1996)Google Scholar
3. Ma, Z., Xu, Y. and Allen, L. H., Appl. Phys. Lett. 61, 225 (1992)Google Scholar
4. Dass, M. L. A., Fraser, D. B. and Wei, C.-S., Appl. Phys. Lett. 58, 1308 (1991)Google Scholar
5. Hsia, S. L., Tan, T. Y., Smith, P. and McGuire, G. E., J. Appl. Phys. 70, 7579 (1991)Google Scholar
6. Tung, R. T., Appl. Phys. Lett. 61, 3461 (1996)Google Scholar
7. Marshall, E. D., Zhang, B., Wang, L. C., Jiao, P.F., Chen, W. X., Sawada, T., Lau, S. S., Kavanagh, K. L. and Kuech, T. F., J. Appl. Phys. 62, 942 (1987)Google Scholar
8. Sands, T., Keramidas, V. G., Yu, A. J., Yu, K-M., Gronsky, R. and Washburn, J., J. Mater. Res. 2, 262 (1987)Google Scholar
9. Aziz, M. J., Sabin, P. C. and Lu, G.-Q., Phys. Rev. B, 44, 9812 (1991)Google Scholar
10. Marshall, E. D., Lau, S. S., Palmstrom, C. J., Sands, T., Schwartz, C. L., Schwarz, S. A., Harbison, J. P., and Florez, L. T., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 148, 163 (1989)Google Scholar
11. Radulescu, F. and McCarthy, J. M., J. Appl. Phys. 86, 995 (1999)Google Scholar
12. Radulescu, F., PhD Thesis, OGI (1999)Google Scholar
13. Berry, B. S. and Pritchet, W. C., J. Appl. Phys. 67, 3661 (1990)Google Scholar
14. Brantley, W. A., J. Appl. Phys. 44, 534 (1973)Google Scholar
15. Johansson, S., Ericson, F. and Schweitz, J-A., J. Appl. Phys. 65, 122 (1989)Google Scholar