Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-76ns8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T04:19:31.602Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Synthetic Fiber and Binder Addition on the Strength Losses Associated with Corrugating Medium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2011

John F. Waterhouse*
Affiliation:
The Institute of Paper Science and Technology, 575 14th St. NW Atlanta, GA 30318
Get access

Abstract

The investigation is concerned with strategies to reduce losses in medium compressive strength during corrugating.

Medium handsheets with a non-random fiber orientation were made using a NSSC pulp and different levels of synthetic fiber addition, including glass and Kevlar pulp, at two levels of wet pressing. Corrugating was performed using a concora fluter, and compressive strength measurements were made in the tip and flank regions of the corrugated medium.

Forming losses are reduced by increased wet pressing with a greater improvement in the flank than the tip region of the flute. A small reduction in tip forming losses is found, for a given furnish when a film forming latex is used. However, a greater reduction is evident when a non-film forming latex is employed.

Forming loss measurements were also made on non-bonded and bonded laminates. The non-bonded laminates resulted in much lower forming losses, while the heat-activated laminates resulted in large forming losses similar to those found with conventional medium.

These experiments suggest that forming losses can be reduced if cost-effective systems are designed which do not activate until the fluting process is complete.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Waterhouse, J. F., TAPPI Proceedings, 1985 Polymers Laminations and Coatings Conference, Chicago (1985).Google Scholar
2. Whitsitt, W. J., Sprague, C. H., Tappi J. 70(2) 9196, (1987).Google Scholar
3. Sprague, C. H., Whitsitt, W. J., Tappi J. 65(10) 133, (1982).Google Scholar
4. Carlsson, L., Ph.D. Thesis, CTH, Gothenberg, Sweden.Google Scholar
5. Whitsitt, W. J., Baum, G. A., Tappi J. 70(4) 107112, (1987).Google Scholar
6. Baum, G. A., I.P.S.T. Technical Paper Series No. 119(12) (1981).Google Scholar
7. Habeger, C. G., Wink, W. A., J. Appl. Polymer Sc. 32:4503–40 (1986).Google Scholar
8. Charles, L. A., Waterhouse, J. F., J. Pulp & Paper Sc. 14(3) J59–J65 (1988).Google Scholar
9. Calvin, S. Fellers, C. Svensk Papperstidning 9 329(1975).Google Scholar