Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-fmk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-07T03:18:00.395Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Radiation Exposure on Glass Alteration in a Steam Environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 1992

D. J. Wronkiewicz ,
L. M. Wang ,
J. K. Bates  and
B. S. Tani
D. J. Wronkiewicz
Affiliation:
Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 South Cass Ave, Argonne, IL 60439-4837
L. M. Wang
Affiliation:
Dept. of Geology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131
J. K. Bates
Affiliation:
Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 South Cass Ave, Argonne, IL 60439-4837
B. S. Tani
Affiliation:
Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 South Cass Ave, Argonne, IL 60439-4837
Get access

Abstract

Several Savannah River Plant (SRL) glass compositions were reacted in steam at temperatures of 150 to 200°C. Half of the tests utilized actinide-doped monoliths and were exposed to an external ionizing gamma source, while the remainder were doped only with U and reacted without gamma exposure. All glass samples readily reacted to form secondary mineral phases within the first week of testing. An in situ layer of smectite initially developed on nonirradiated SRL 202 glass test samples. After 21 days, a thin layer of illite was precipitated from solution onto the smectite layer. A number of alteration products including zeolite, Casilicate, and alkali or alkaline earth uranyl silicate phases were also distributed over most sample surfaces. In the irradiated SRL 202 glass tests, up to three layers enveloped rounded, and sometimes fractured, glass cores. After 35 to 56 days these remnant cores were replaced by a mottled or banded Fe- and Si-rich material. The formation of some secondary mineral phases also has been accelerated in the irradiated tests, and in some instances, the irradiated environment may have led to the precipitation of a different suite of minerals. The alteration layer(s) developed at rates of 2.3 and 32 μm/day for the nonirradiated and irradiated SRL 202 glasses, respectively, indicating that layer development is accelerated by a factor of ∼10 to 15X due to radiation exposure under the test conditions.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 294: Symposium V – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XVI , 1992 , 183
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Burns, W. G., Hughes, A. E., Marples, J. A. C., Nelson, R. S., and Stoneham, A. M., J. Nucl. Mater. 107, 245 (1982).Google Scholar
2. Barkatt, A., Barkatt, A., and Sousanpour, W., Nucl. Tech. 60, 218 (1983).Google Scholar
3. Weber, W. J. and Roberts, F. P., Nucl. Tech. 60, 178 (1983).Google Scholar
4. Reed, D. T. and Van Konynenburg, R. A., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 112, 393-404 (1987).Google Scholar
5. Wronkiewicz, D. J., Young, J. E., and Bates, J. K., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 212, 99-106 (1991).Google Scholar
6. Yokayama, H., Hermansson, H. P., Christensen, H., Bjorner, I. K., and Werme, L., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 44, 601-608 (1985).Google Scholar
7. McVay, G. L., Weber, W. J., and Pederson, L. R., Nucl. and Chem. Waste Mgmt. 2, 103 (1981).Google Scholar
8. Abrajano, T. A. Jr., Bates, J. K., and Mazer, J. J., J. Non-Cryst. Sol. 108, 269 (1989).Google Scholar
9. Sato, S., Furuya, H., Asakura, K., Ohta, K., and Tamai, T., Nucl. Instru. Meth. in Phys. Res. B1, 534 (1984).Google Scholar
10. Howitt, D. G., Chan, H. W., DeNatale, J. F., and Heuer, J. P., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 74, 1145 (1991).Google Scholar