Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-t6hkb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-15T23:37:47.403Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Energetic Inert Gas Atom Impact Effects During Ion Beam Multilayer Deposition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

X. W. Zhou
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903
W. Zou
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903
H. N. G. Wadley
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903
Get access

Abstract

New magnetic field sensors and non-volatile magnetic random access memories can be built from giant magnetoresistive multilayers with nanoscale thickness. The performance of these devices is enhanced by decreasing the atomic scale interfacial roughness and interlayer mixing of the multilayers. During ion beam sputtering, inert gas neutrals with energies between 50 and 200 eV impact the growth surface. A molecular dynamics method has been used to study the effects of these impacts on the surface roughness and interlayer mixing of model nickel/copper multilayers. The results indicate that impacts with energy above 50 eV cause mixing due to the exchange of Ni atoms with Cu atoms in an underlying Cu crystal. The extent of the mixing increases with impact energy, but decreases as the number of the Ni monolayers above the Cu crystal increases. While Xe and Ar impacts have a similar mixing effect at low energies, heavier Xe ions/neutrals induce more significant mixing at high energies.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Honda, S., Ohmoto, S., Imada, R. and Nawate, M., J. Magn. Magn. Mater 126, 419 (1993).10.1016/0304-8853(93)90643-GGoogle Scholar
2 Prinz, G. A., Science 282, 1660 (1998).10.1126/science.282.5394.1660Google Scholar
3 Butler, W. H. (private communication).Google Scholar
4 Kano, H., Kagawa, K., Suzuki, A., Okabe, A., Hayashi, K. and Aso, K., Appl. Phys. Lett. 63, 2839 (1993).10.1063/1.110791Google Scholar
5 Zhou, X. W. and Wadley, H. N. G., J. Appl. Phys. 84, 2301 (1998).10.1063/1.368297Google Scholar
6 Zhou, X. W. and Wadley, H. N. G., J. Appl. Phys. 87, 553 (2000).10.1063/1.371899Google Scholar
7 Zhou, X. W. and Wadley, H. N. G., in preparation.Google Scholar
8 Kools, J. C. S., J. Appl. Phys. 77, 2993 (1995).10.1063/1.359565Google Scholar
9 Zhou, X. W., Sainathan, S., Wadley, H. N. G., in preparation.Google Scholar
10 Zhou, X. W. and Wadley, H. N. G., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., (1999), in pressGoogle Scholar
11 Foiles, S. M., Phys. Rev. B 32, 7685 (1985).10.1103/PhysRevB.32.7685Google Scholar
12 Johnson, R. E., in Energetic Charged-Particle Interactions with Atmospheres and Surfaces, Physics and Chemistry in Space Planetology, Vol. 19, ed. Lanzerotti, L. J., Hill, M. and Stoffler, D., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, p. 68, 1990.10.1007/978-3-642-48375-2Google Scholar
13 Zhou, X. W., Johnson, R. A. and Wadley, H. N. G., Acta Mater. 45, 1513 (1997).10.1016/S1359-6454(96)00283-2Google Scholar
14 Parkin, S. S. P., Appl. Phys. Lett. 61, 1358 (1992).10.1063/1.107591Google Scholar