Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-xq9c7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T00:32:17.077Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of Protective Coatings for the ‘In Situ’ Preservation of Historic Timber Buildings in a Harsh Antarctic Environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

Janet Hughes*
Affiliation:
Institute for Antarctic and Southern Ocean Studies, University of Tasmania, GPO Box 252C, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia
Get access

Abstract

The Australasian Antarctic Expedition base at Commonwealth Bay (67°S 142°E), also known as ‘Mawson's Huts’ include some of the earliest buildings in Antarctica. The prefabricated timber buildings of Oregon beams and Baltic Pine (Pinus sylvestris) claddings were erected in January 1912 and were occupied for two years: they are thus approximately contemporary with the better known Scott and Shackleton huts near McMurdo Base in the Ross Sea.

The expedition was led by Dr Douglas Mawson, later Professor Sir Douglas Mawson, and its inspiration was scientific rather than a race to the South Pole. The buildings and artefacts remaining on the headland, also called Cape Denison, reflect considerable scientific achievement in geology, upper atmosphere physics, surveying, meteorology and biology and the site constitutes an important monument in the early exploration of this remote and inhospitable continent.

While the huts are of recent date, the rapid rate of deterioration due to the extreme climate means there is some urgency to developing a method of preserving the building. The timbers have been seriously worn, or ‘corraded’ by snow particles carried in the katabatic winds. These winds can exceed 300km per hour, sometimes for days. The isolation of the site, accessible by sea for only three months of the year adds to the logistical difficulties. There has been considerable public debate in Australia about which method of preservation is appropriate.

The author, a materials conservator and industrial chemist, visited the site in December 1985 and has been studying the problems of the site as a postgraduate student for the past year.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Hughes, J. D., Bull. Inst. for the Conservation of Cultural Materials, 14 (3&4): 1-32 (1988); Historic Environment 3_(1&2): 19-24 (1991).Google Scholar
2. Anderson, R. S., Annals of Glacio, Ja: 294 (1989)Google Scholar
3. Bagnold, R. A., The physics of blown sand and desert dunes, (Methuen, London 1941).Google Scholar
4. Berg, N.H., Arctic and Alpine Research 18 (2): 147-16 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Dietrich, R.V., J Glaciology, 1E (78): 148-149 (1977)Google Scholar
6. Earl, A. et al, Cold Regions Sci. and Tech. Ii. (2): 199-202 (1985).Google Scholar
7. Kind, R. J., Cold Regions Sci. and Tech. 122 (3): 217-228 (1985).Google Scholar
8. Suzuki, T., Takahishi, K., J. Geology U~:23-36 (1981)Google Scholar
9. Madigan, C. T., Scientific Reoorts Series B Vol IV Meteorologry- Tabulated and Reduced Records of the Cape Denison Station. Adelie Land. AAE 1911-14, NSW Govt. Printer, 1929.Google Scholar
10. Butkovich, T. R., Hardness of single Ice crystals SIPRE Research Paper 9, May 1954.Acknowledgements The assistance of the Australian Antarctic Division in providing transport, clothing and some supplies in Antarctica is gratefully acknowledged. The Australian Antarctic Science Advisory Committee also provided a small grant to assist this project. The assistance of Dr Jim Hasick and Kevin Sheridan at Mawson Station greatly aided the installation of the testing racks. Childcare by Katryna Bilyk, Linda Aldridge and Rosalie Harwood was essential in providing time and peace of mind during my absence in Antactica. Thank you!Google Scholar