Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T23:28:56.268Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evidence for Exchange Between Free and Deep Hydrogen (Deuterium) During Diffusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Howard M. Branz
Affiliation:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO 80401, USA
Sally Asher
Affiliation:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO 80401, USA
Yueqin Xu
Affiliation:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO 80401, USA
Mathieu Kemp
Affiliation:
Dept. of Engineering Physics, Ecole Polytechnique, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Get access

Abstract

We do not observe any immobile deuterium in secondary ion mass spectrometry D profiles taken after long anneals of hydrogenated amorphous silicon sandwich structures with a thin deuterated interior layer. This suggests that a single deep H level (∼1.4 eV deep) controls H diffusion. On its face, our result contradicts nuclear magnetic resonance and H effusion measurements that show about 30% of H in a-Si:H is “isolated” and deeply bound (∼ 2.1 eV deep). We reconcile our experimental results with the existence of isolated deep H by assuming there is a low-barrier (<< 1.4 eV) exchange process between free H and deep D. In tracer experiments, exchange has the effect of increasing the apparent emission rate of the deep D to nearly that of the shallowest trapped H. We solve for the D profiles and confirm that a deep-trapped D component is consistent with our D tracer profiles if and only if exchange processes are important. We also find that the mean distance D travels before retrapping (100–200Å) is determined by an exchange process of free D with trapped H.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Branz, H. M., Asher, S. E., and Nelson, B. P., Phys. Rev. B 47, 7061 (1993).Google Scholar
2. Kemp, M. and Branz, H. M., Phys. Rev. B 47, 7067 (1993).Google Scholar
3. Reimer, J. A., Vaughan, R. W., and Knights, J. C., Solid State Commun. 37, 161 (1981).Google Scholar
4. Carlos, W. E. and Taylor, P. C., Phys. Rev. B 26, 3605 (1982).Google Scholar
5. Mahan, A. H., Johnson, E. J., Webb, J. D., Crandall, R. S., and Branz, H. M., this conference.Google Scholar
6. Branz, H. M., Asher, S. E., Nelson, B., and Kemp, M., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 164–166, 269 (1993).Google Scholar
7. Abeles, B., Yang, L., Leta, D. P., and Majkrzak, C., in Interfaces, Superlattices and Thin Films, 77, edited by Dow, J. D. and Schuller, I. K. (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, 1987), p. 623.Google Scholar
8. Abeles, B., Yang, L., Leta, D., and Majkrzak, C., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 97–98, 353 (1987).Google Scholar
9. Jackson, W. B., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 164–166, 263 (1993).Google Scholar
10. Beyer, W. and Wagner, H., in Amorphous Silicon Technology-1994, edited by Schiff, E. A., Hack, M., Madan, A., Powell, M., and Matsuda, A. (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, 1994), p. 323.Google Scholar
11. Kemp, M. and Branz, H. M., unpublished.Google Scholar
12. Beyer, W. and Wagner, H., J. Appl. Phys. 53, 8745 (1982).Google Scholar