Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-fnpn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T11:42:30.079Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Expansion of Cementitious Materials Exposed to Sulfate Solutions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

James M. Pommersheim  and
James R. Clifton
James M. Pommersheim
Affiliation:
Civil Engineering Dept., Bucknell University, Lewisburg, PA 17837
James R. Clifton
Affiliation:
National Institute of Science and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899
Get access

Abstract

Disposal of low-level radioactive waste in concrete vaults buried underground is being considered in the United States and a potentially significant degradation process is sulfate attack. The results of experimental studies and of modeling of the kinetics of sulfate attack of cement-based materials are given. It was concluded that the expansion process involves a two-stage mechanism. The first stage is likely to be diffusion controlled and the second stage appears to be acceleratory due to the development and spread of cracks.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 333: Symposium V – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XVII , 1993 , 363
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Philip, J. and Clifton, J.R. in Fly Ash, Silica Fume, Slag, and Natural Pozzolan in Concrete, edited by Maholtra, V.M. (American Concrete Institute SP-132, Detroit, MI, 1992) 713–730.Google Scholar
2 Clifton, J.R. and Knab, L.I., NIST Report No. 89-4086, National Institute of Science and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 1989.Google Scholar
3 Walton, J.C., Plansky, L.E., and Smith, R.W., NUREG Report No 5542, 1990.Google Scholar
4 Clifton, J.R. and Pommersheim, J.M., NIST Report No. 4954, 1992.Google Scholar
5 Atkinson, A. and Hearne, J. A., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIII, edited by Oversby, V.M. and Brown, P.W. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 176, Pittsburg, PA, 1990) 149–156.Google Scholar
6 ASTM Designation C 1120 (ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 1993).Google Scholar
7 Odler, I. and Jawed, I., in Materials of Concrete II, edited by Skalny, J. and Mindess, S. (American Ceramic Society, Westerville, OH, 1991) 221–247.Google Scholar
8 Ridge, M.J. and Surkevicius, H., J. Appl. Chem. 12, 246–252 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 Mehta, P.K., Cem. Cone. Res. 13, 401–406 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10 Lea, F.M., The Chemistry of Cement and Concrete, 3rd. edition, Chemical Publishing Co., New York, NY, 1971.Google Scholar
11 Gollop, R.S. and Taylor, H.F.W., Cem. and Cone. Res,. 22, 1027–1038, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12 Pommersheim, J.M. and Clifton, J.R., NIST Report No. 4405, National Institute of Science and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 1990.Google Scholar
13 Mandelbot, B.B., The Fractal Geometry of Nature, W.H. Freeman and Company, San Fransicso, 1982.Google Scholar