Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T07:32:41.712Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experiments Towards the Realisation of a Monolithically-Integrated Optical Isolator Incorporating Quasi-Phase Matched Magneto-Optical Effects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Barry. M. Holmes ,
David. C. Hutchings  and
Josef. J. Bregenzer
Barry. M. Holmes
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics and Electrical Engineering, The University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8LT, Scotland, UK
David. C. Hutchings
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics and Electrical Engineering, The University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8LT, Scotland, UK
Josef. J. Bregenzer
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics and Electrical Engineering, The University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8LT, Scotland, UK
Get access

Abstract

Experiments towards the realisation of the necessary components for future integrated waveguide optical isolators have been conducted. The design, fabrication and characterisation of GaAs/AlGaAs reciprocal mode converters, realised through the use of three novel approaches, is reported. These devices have been tested at λ=0.9m and 1.3m, producing TE-TM conversion efficiencies up to 70%. Initial investigations into the inclusion of magneto optic materials with III-V semiconductor structures for non-reciprocal mode conversion are also discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 834: Symposium J – Magneto-Optical Materials for Photonics and Recording , 2004 , J4.4
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Stubkjaer, K. E. and Small, M. B., IEEE J. Quant. Opt. QE–20, 472–478 (1984)Google Scholar
2. Hutchings, D. C., J. Appl. Phys. D. 36, 2222–2230 (2003).Google Scholar
3. Tzolov, P. and Fontaine, M., Opt. Commun. 127, 7–13 (1996).Google Scholar
4. Huang, J. Z., Scarmozzino, R., Nagy, G., Steel, M. J., and Osgood, R. M., IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 12, 317–319 (2000).Google Scholar
5. Groen, F. H., Zhu, Y.C. and van der Tol, J.J.G.M., Proc. ECIO'03, Prague, pp. 141–144, 2003 Google Scholar
6. El-Refaei, H., Yevick, D., and Jones, T., J. Lightwave Technol. 22, 1352–1357 (2004).Google Scholar
7. Stadler, B., Vaccaro, K., Yip, P., Lorenzo, J., Li, Y. and Cherif, M., IEEE Trans. Magn. 38, 1564–1567 (2002).Google Scholar