Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-fmk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-06T19:24:35.912Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fe tracer diffusion in L10 ordered FePt

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

Y. Nosé
Affiliation:
The Institute of Scientific and Industrial Research, Osaka University, Mihogaoka 8–1, Ibaraki, Osaka 567–0047, Japan
T. Ikeda
Affiliation:
The Institute of Scientific and Industrial Research, Osaka University, Mihogaoka 8–1, Ibaraki, Osaka 567–0047, Japan
H. Nakajima
Affiliation:
The Institute of Scientific and Industrial Research, Osaka University, Mihogaoka 8–1, Ibaraki, Osaka 567–0047, Japan
K. Tanaka
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Kyoto University, Yoshida-honmachi, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606–8501, Japan
H. Numakura
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Kyoto University, Yoshida-honmachi, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606–8501, Japan
Get access

Abstract

Tracer diffusion coefficient of 59Fe in FePt with the tetragonal L10 ordered structure has been measured by an ion-beam sputter-sectioning technique in the temperature range from 1173 to 1374 K. Anisotropy in diffusion has been studied using single-variant single-crystal specimens. The diffusion coefficient in the direction perpendicular to [001] axis (in the a-axis direction), Da, is larger than that in the [001] (c-axis) direction, Dc, as expected from the atomic arrangement of the L10 ordered structure. The ratio of the diffusion coefficients, Da/Dc, is 1.33.6 for Fe42Pt58 and smaller at higher temperatures. The activation energy for the diffusion is 259 ± 1 kJ/mol for Da and 309 ± 18 kJ/mol for Dc, while the pre-exponential factor is and , respectively in Fe42Pt58.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Kucera, J. and Million, B., Phys. Stat. Sol. (a), 31, 275 (1975).Google Scholar
[2] Cermak, J. and Kucera, J., Kovove Materialy 17, 3 (1979).Google Scholar
[3] Nosé, Y., Numakura, H., Koiwa, M., Ikeda, T. and Nakajima, H., Defect Diffusion Forum 194–199, 559 (2001).Google Scholar
[4] Nosé, Y., Ikeda, T., Nakajima, H. and Numakura, H., Mater. Trans. 44, (2003) in press.Google Scholar
[5] Nosé, Y., Kushida, A., Ikeda, T., Nakajima, H. and Numakura, H., Proc. Int. Conf. On Designing of Interfacial Structures in Advanced Materials and their Joints, DIS’02 (Osaka University, Osaka, 2002), in press.Google Scholar
[6] Kushida, A., Tanaka, K. and Namakura, H., Mater. Trans. 44, (2003) in press.Google Scholar
[7] Phase Diagrams of Binary Iron Alloys, ed. Okamoto, H., ASM Int. 3rd ed., pp. 330 (1993).Google Scholar
[8] Tanaka, K., Ichitubo, T. and Koiwa, M., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 312, 118 (2001).Google Scholar
[9] Darken, L. S., Trans. Am. Inst. Min. Engrs. 175, 184 (1948).Google Scholar
[10] Manning, J. R., Acta Metall. 15, 817 (1967).Google Scholar
[11] Ikeda, T., Numakura, H. and Koiwa, M., Acta Mater. 46, 6605 (1998); corrigendum Acta Mater. 47, 1993 (1999).Google Scholar
[12] Fredriksson, P. and Seetharaman, S., Scan. J. Metall. 30, 258 (2001).Google Scholar