Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T22:29:19.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

GaInAs/GaInP Double Barrier Structures: Growth and Application in Tunneling Diodes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

C.M. Reaves
Affiliation:
Departments of Materials andUniversity of California, Santa Barbara CA 93106
J.C. Yen
Affiliation:
Electrical and Computer EngineeringUniversity of California, Santa Barbara CA 93106
N A. Cevallos
Affiliation:
Electrical and Computer EngineeringUniversity of California, Santa Barbara CA 93106
U.K. Mishra
Affiliation:
Electrical and Computer EngineeringUniversity of California, Santa Barbara CA 93106
S.P. DenBaars
Affiliation:
Departments of Materials andUniversity of California, Santa Barbara CA 93106
Get access

Abstract

We have fabricated resonant tunneling diodes (RTD's) containing a GaInAs quantum well and strained GaInP barriers. These diodes exhibit good characteristics at 80 K with a peak to valley current ratio of 1.34 which is comparable to other reports for RTD in this material system. Additional RTD's were made using a InAs rich well region to study the effect of strain compensation. To investigate the properties of these structures, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and low temperature photoluminescence (PL) were performed. TEM shows that both RTD structures contain misfit dislocations. PL measurements indicate that the dislocations are not significantly affecting the GaInAs quantum well.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Luryi, S. in High-Speed Semiconductor Devices edited by Sze, S.M. (New York, Wiley Interscience, 1990) pp. 106124.Google Scholar
2. Razeghi, M., Tardella, A., R.A. Davies. Long, A.P., Kelly, M.J., Britton, E., Boothroyd, C., and Stobbs, W.M, Electron. Lett., 23, 116 (1987).Google Scholar
3. Higgs, A.W., Taylor, L.L., Apsley, N., Bass, S.J., and Hutchinson, H.J., Electron. Lett., 24, 322 (1988).Google Scholar
4. Vuong, T.H.H., Tsui, D.C., and Tsang, W.T., Appl. Phys. Lett., 50, 212 (1987).Google Scholar
5. Sekiguchi, T., Miyamoto, Y., and Furuya, K., J. Crystal Growth, 124, 807 (1992).Google Scholar
6. Beam, E.A. III and Seabaugh, A.C., Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 240, 33 (1992).Google Scholar
7. Beam, E.A. III, Henderson, T.S., Seabaugh, A.C., and Yang, J.Y., J. Crystal Growth, 116, 436 (1992).Google Scholar
8. Frensley, W.R., Band profile software for modeling devices, University of Texas, Dallas.Google Scholar
9. Miller, B.I., Koren, U., Young, M.G., and Chien, M.D., Appl. Phys. Lett., 58, 1952 (1991).Google Scholar
10. Naniwae, K., Sugou, S., Anan, T., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 33, L156 (1994).Google Scholar
11. Temkin, H., Gershoni, D.G., Chu, S.N.G., Vandenberg, J.M., Hamm, R.A., and Panish, M.B., Appl. Phys. Lett., 55, 1668 (1989).Google Scholar
12. Fitzgerald, E. A., Materials Science Reports, 7, 87 (1991).Google Scholar
13. Grundmann, M., Lienert, U., Christen, J., Bimberg, D., Fischer-Colbrie, A., and Miller, J.N., J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B8, 751 (1990); M. Grundmann, J. Christen, D. Bimberg, A. Fischer-Colbrie, and R. Hull, J. Appl. Phys., 66, 2214 (1989).Google Scholar