Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T08:13:56.848Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ge Related Defect-Complex Induced Luminescence in InGaAsP

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

B. M. Arora
Affiliation:
Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Homi Bhabha Road, Bombay 400005, India
S. Chakravarty
Affiliation:
Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Homi Bhabha Road, Bombay 400005, India
S. S. Chandvankar
Affiliation:
Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Homi Bhabha Road, Bombay 400005, India
R. Rajalakshmi
Affiliation:
Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Homi Bhabha Road, Bombay 400005, India
A. K. Srivastava
Affiliation:
Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Homi Bhabha Road, Bombay 400005, India
Get access

Abstract

Germanium doping of InGaAsP epitaxial layers grown by liquid phase epitaxy produces n type conduction with a net distribution coefficient KGe∼ 5×10-3. In addition, Ge doping introduces a broad band (∼0.2eV) of efficient luminescence which is red shifted with respect to the band edge. The intensity of this band grows with increasing Ge concentration. In all the samples, the integrated intensity of the broad band varies relatively less in the temperature range 15K to about 90K. At higher temperatures, the intensity falls exponentially with an activation energy of 0.05 - 0.07 eV. The emission spectra are compared with the configuration-coordinate model of the emission from a Ge related complex.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. As a general reference “InGaAsP Alloy Semiconductors”, edited by Pearsall, T.P. (Wiley, New York, 1982).Google Scholar
2.Houston, P.A., J. Mater. Science 16, 2935 (1981).Google Scholar
3.Feng, M., Tashima, M.M., Cooke, L.W., Milano, R.A. and Stillman, G.E., Appl. Phys. Lett. 34, 91 (1979).Google Scholar
4.Antypass, G.A. and Shen, L.Y.L., Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. 33b, 96 (1977).Google Scholar
5.Pearsall, T.P., Beuchet, G., Hirtz, J.P., Visentin, N. and Bonnet, M., Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. 56, 639 (1981).Google Scholar
6.Zschauer, K.H. in Festkörper Probleme XV, edited by Queisser, H.J. (Pergamon, Braunschweig, 1975) p.l.Google Scholar
7.Kuphal, E., J. Cryst. Growth 54, 117 (1981).Google Scholar
8.Williams, E.W. and Bebb, H.B. in Semiconductors and Semimetals, edited by Willardson, R.K. and Beer, A.C. (Academic Press, New York, 1972) p. 359.Google Scholar
9.Chandvankar, S.S. and Arora, B.M. (Unpublished).Google Scholar
10.Ridley, B.K., Quantum Processes in Semiconductors (Clarendon, Oxford, 1982)Google Scholar