Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T18:17:36.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Heat Treatment of Nanocrystalline Al2O3-Zr02

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Bridget M. Smyser
Affiliation:
Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Department of Materials Engineering, Worcester, MA 01609
Jane F. Connelly
Affiliation:
Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Department of Materials Engineering, Worcester, MA 01609
Richard D. Sisson Jr
Affiliation:
Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Department of Materials Engineering, Worcester, MA 01609
Virgil Provenzano
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Code 6320, Washington, DC 20375–5343
Get access

Abstract

The effects of grain size on the phase transformations in nanocrystalline ZrO2-Al2O3 have been experimentally investigated. Compositions from 10 to 50 vol% Al2O3 in ZrO2 were obtained as a hydroxide gel. The powders were then calcined at 600 °C for 17 hours and heat treated at 1100 °C for 24 and 120 hours and at 1200 °C for 2 hours. The phase distribution and grain size were determined using x-ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopy. The initial grain size after calcining was 8–17 nm. It was determined that the critical ZrO2 grain size to avoid the tetragonal to monoclinic phase transformation on cooling from 1100 °C was between 17 and 25 nm. Samples containing 50% Al2O3 maintained a grain size below the critical size for all times and temperatures. The 30% Al2O3 samples showed the same behavior in all but one heat treatment. The remainder of the samples showed significant grain growth and at least partial transformation to the monoclinic phase.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Birringer, R. and Gleiter, H., in Encyclopedia of Materials Science and Engineering, Cahn, R.W., Pergamon Press, 1988, p. 339349.Google Scholar
2. Ashley, S., Mechanical Engineering, 116, (2) p. 5257 (1994).Google Scholar
3. Birringer, R., Gleiter, H., Klein, H.-P., Marquardt, P., Physics Letters, 102A, (8), p. 365369 (1984).Google Scholar
4. Gleiter, H., NanoStructured Materials, 6, p. 314 (1995).Google Scholar
5. Yoshimura, M., Ceramic Bulletin, 67,(12), p. 19501955 (1988).Google Scholar
6. Lange, F.F., Journal of Materials Science, 17, p. 225234 (1982).Google Scholar
7. Curtis, C.E‥ in Forty-Eighth Annual Meeting, The American Ceramic Society, (Buffalo, NY, American Ceramic Society, 1946), p. 180196.Google Scholar
8. Garvie, R.C., The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 82, (2), p. 218224 (1978).Google Scholar
9. Lange, F.F. and Hirlinger, M.M., Journal of the American Ceramics Society, 70, (11), p. 827830(1987).Google Scholar
10. Lange, F.F., Journal of the American Ceramics Society, 69, (3), p. 240–42 (1986).Google Scholar
11. Aita, C.R., Scanlan, C.M., and Gajdardziska-Josifovska, M., JOM, 46, (10), p. 4042 (1994).Google Scholar
12. Chatterjee, A., Pradhan, S.K., Datta, A., De, M., Chakravorty, D., Journal of Materials Research, 9, (2), p. 263265 (1994).Google Scholar
13. Garvie, R.C. and Goss, M.F., Journal of Materials Science, 21, p. 12531257 (1986).Google Scholar
14. Duelos, R. and Crampon, J., Scripta Metallurgica et Materialia, 24, p. 18251830 (1990).Google Scholar
15. French, J.D., Harmer, M.P., Chan, H.M. and Miller, G. A., Journal of the American Ceramics Society, 73, (8), p. 2508–10 (1990).Google Scholar