Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-nptnm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-11T20:19:44.120Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Heteroepitaxial Growth of MgO Films on NiO(100) Single Crystal Surfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

S. Imaduddin
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Surface Science and Technology, 5764 Sawyer Research Center, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469-5764
A.M. Davidson
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Surface Science and Technology, 5764 Sawyer Research Center, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469-5764
R.J. Lad
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Surface Science and Technology, 5764 Sawyer Research Center, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469-5764
Get access

Abstract

Epitaxial MgO layers were grown on cleaved NiO(100) single crystal surfaces. The less than 1% lattice mismatch between MgO and NiO allows almost ideal epitaxy of MgO at 100°C. The epitaxial films were created by dosing Mg onto stoichiometric NiO(100) both in ultra-high vacuum (UHV) and in an O2 atmosphere (5×10−7 Torr). Chemical interactions at the resulting interfaces were studied using XPS. When Mg is dosed onto NiO(100) in UHV, MgO forms by interacting with oxygen anions in the NiO substrate thereby reducing the nickel cations. Metallic Mg layers begin to form upon subsequent dosing. When Mg is deposited in O2, epitaxial MgO(100) layers grow to a thickness of at least 50Å as confirmed by in situ RHEED and LEED observations. Negligible intermixing between the MgO and NiO is observed during growth at 100°C and on subsequent annealing in UHV up to 600°C.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Lad, R.J., Surface Review and Letters (in press).Google Scholar
[2] Henrich, V.E. and Cox, P.A., The Surface Science of Metal Oxides, (Cambridge University Press, Great Britain, 1994).Google Scholar
[3] Wu, M.C., Corneille, J.A., Estrada, C.A., Goodman, D.W., Chem. Phys. Lett. 182, 472 (1991)Google Scholar
[4] Burke, M. L. and Goodman, D.W., Surface Sci. 311, 17 (1994).Google Scholar
[5] Peacor, S.D. and Hibma, T., Surface Sci. 310, 11 (1994).Google Scholar
[6] Catana, A., Locquet, J.P., Paik, S. M., Schuller, I.K., Phys. Rev. B 46, 15477 (1992).Google Scholar
[7] Carey, M.J., Berkowitz, A.E., Borchers, J.A., Erwin, R.W., Phys. Rev. B 47, 9952 (1993).Google Scholar
[8] Lind, D.M., Berry, S.D., Chern, G., Mathias, H., Testardi, L.R., Phys. Rev. B 45, 1838 (1992).Google Scholar
[9] Tran, T.T. and Chambers, S.A., App. Surface Science 81,161 (1994)Google Scholar
[10] Imaduddin, S. and Lad, R.J., Surface Sci. 290, 35 (1993).Google Scholar
[11] Fuggle, J.C., Watson, I.M., Fabian, D.J., Affrossman, S., J. Phys. F 5, 375 (1975).Google Scholar
[12] Hoogewijs, R., Fiermans, L., Vennik, J., J. Elec. Spec. Rel. Phen. 11, 171 (1977).Google Scholar
[13] Wagner, C.D. and Biloen, P., Surface Sci. 35, 82 (1973).Google Scholar
[14] Reed, T.B., Free Enerqy of Formation for Binary Compounds (MIT Press, 1971).Google Scholar
[15] Yu, Yan and Lad, R.J., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc Vol 317 583, (1994).Google Scholar
[16] Wartenberg, H. von and Prophet, E., Z. Anorg. AlIg. Chem. 208, 369 (1932).Google Scholar
[17] Levin, E.M., Robbins, C.R., McMurdie, H.F., Phase Diagrams for Ceramists, edited by Reser, M.K. (The American Ceramic Society, Ohio, 1964).Google Scholar
[18] Hahn, W.C. Jr. and Muan, A., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 19, 338 (1961).Google Scholar
[19] Appel, M. and Pask, J. A., Journ. Amer. Cer. Soc. 54, 152 (1971).Google Scholar