Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T22:26:21.401Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hydrogen Energetics and Transport Kinetics in Amorphous Silicon Hydride

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

A. J. Franz
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109
J. L. Gland
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109
Get access

Abstract

To understand the electrical properties and behavior of amorphous silicon, it is imperative to understand the behavior of hydrogen in the amorphous silicon lattice. Although considerable effort has been extended to study hydrogen trapping in a-Si:H, the energetics and populations of the traps remain unresolved. We have developed a reaction diffusion model which includes multiple bulk trapping mechanisms, bulk transport, and realistic surface processes. The model results are compared with existing hydrogen temperature programmed evolution data, isothermal hydrogen evolution experiments, and thermal quenching experiments. We find consistently good fits for all three types of experiments with a shallow trap depth of 1.5 eV and deep trap depth of 1.8–1.9 eV below the mobility level, with 20–30% of hydrogen present in the deep trap. The difference of 0.3–0.4 eV between the two trap depths is similar to the defect formation activation energy and suggests a defect formation mechanism which involves movement of hydrogen from a deep to a shallow trap.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Kakalios, J., Semiconductors and Semimetals 34, p. 381 (1987).Google Scholar
2. Street, R.A., Kakalios, J., and Hayes, T.M., Phys. Rev. B 34(4), p. 3030 (1986).Google Scholar
3. Xu, X., Okumura, A., Morimoto, A., Kumeda, M., Shimizu, T., Phys. Rev. B 38(12), p. 8371 (1988-II).Google Scholar
4. Street, R.A. and Winer, K., Phys. Rev. B 40, p. 6236 (1989).Google Scholar
5. Santos, P.V., and Jackson, W.B., Phys.Rev. B 46, p. 4595 (1992).Google Scholar
6. Beyer, W., Physica B 170, p. 105 (1991).Google Scholar
7. Branz, H.M., Asher, S., Xu, Y., and Kemp, M., Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 377, p. 331 (1995).Google Scholar
8. Nakamura, M., Ohno, T., Miyata, K., Konishi, N., and Suzuki, T., J.Appl. Phys. 65, p. 3061 (1989).Google Scholar
9. Zafar, S. and Schiff, E.A., Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, p. 1493 (1991).Google Scholar
10. Mahan, A.H., Johnson, E.J., Crandall, R.S., and Branz, H.M., Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 377, p. 401 (1995).Google Scholar
11. Jackson, W.B., Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids 164–166, p. 263 (1993).Google Scholar
12. Jackson, W.B., Nickel, N.H., Johnson, N.M., Pardo, F., Santos, P.V., Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 336, p. 311 (1994).Google Scholar
13. Zellama, K., Germain, P., and Squelard, S., Phys. Rev. B 23, p. 6648 (1981).Google Scholar
14. Allan, D.C., Joannopoulos, J.D., and Pollard, W.B., Phys. Rev. B 25, p. 3475 (1982).Google Scholar
15. Van de Walle, C.G. and Street, R.A., Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 377, p. 389 (1995).Google Scholar
16. Beyer, W. and Wagner, H., J. Appl. Phys. 53(12), p. 8745 (1982).Google Scholar