Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-4hvwz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T15:25:59.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hyperplastic Forming: Process Potential and Factors Affecting Formability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Glenn S. Daehn
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, Daehn.1@osu.edu
Vincent J. Vohnout
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, Daehn.1@osu.edu
Subrangshu Datta
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, Daehn.1@osu.edu
Get access

Abstract

This paper has two distinct goals. First, we argue in an extended introduction that high velocity forming, as can be implemented through electromagnetic forming, is a technology that should be developed. As a process used in conjunction with traditional stamping, it may offer dramatically improved formability, reduced wrinkling and active control of springback among other advantages. In the body of the paper we describe the important factors that lead to improved formability at high velocity. In particular, high sample velocity can inhibit neck growth. There is a sample size dependence where larger samples have better ductility than those of smaller dimensions. These aspects are at least partially described by the recent model of Freund and Shenoy. In addition to this, boundary conditions imposed by sample launch and die impact can have important effects on formability.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. http://www.osu.edu/hyperplasticity.Google Scholar
2. Moon, F.C., Magneto-Solid Mechanics, John Wiley and Sons Inc., 1984.Google Scholar
4. High Velocity Forming of Metals, Revised Edition, Bruno, E.L., ed., ASTME, 1968 Google Scholar
3. Davies, R. and Austin, E. R., Developments in High Speed Metal Forming, Industrial Press, New York, 1970.Google Scholar
4. Considere, A., Ann Ponts Chaussees, 9, 574–75 (1885).Google Scholar
5. Swift, H. W., J. Mech. Phys. of Sol., 1, pp. 1–18 (1952).10.1016/0022-5096(52)90002-1Google Scholar
6. Marciniak, Z. and Kuczynski, K., hIt. J. Mech. Sci., 9, 609 (1967).10.1016/0020-7403(67)90066-5Google Scholar
7. Keeler, S. P. and Backofen, W. A., Trans ASM, 56, 25 (1963).Google Scholar
8. Goodwin, G. M., SAE Automotive Congress, Paper 680093 (1968).Google Scholar
9. Hecker, S. S., Metals Eng. Quart, 14, 30 (1974).Google Scholar
10. Hart, E. W., Acta Met, 15, 351 (1967)10.1016/0001-6160(67)90211-8Google Scholar
11. Ghosh, A. K. and Ayres, R. A., Met Trans, 7A, 1589 (1976).10.1007/BF02656404Google Scholar
12. Pearson, C. E., J. Inst. Metals. 54, 111 (1934).Google Scholar
13. Avrey, D. H. and Backofen, W. A., Trans Q. ASM, 58, 551–62 (1965).Google Scholar
14. Morrison, W. B., Trans Met Soc AIME, 242, pp. 22212227 (1968)Google Scholar
15. Hu, X. and Daehn, G.S., Acta Mater., 44, pp 1021–33, 1996.10.1016/1359-6454(95)00228-6Google Scholar
16. Altynova, M., Hu, X. and Daehn, G. S., Met and Mat Trans, 27A, 1837–43 (1996)10.1007/BF02651933Google Scholar
17. vonKarman, T. and Duwez, P., J. Appl. Phys., 21, 987 (1950).10.1063/1.1699544Google Scholar
18. Shenoy, V. B. and Freund, L. B., J Mech. Phys. Solids, 47, 22092233.10.1016/S0022-5096(99)00031-9Google Scholar
19. Hill, R., In: Problems in Continuum Mechanics, SIAM, Philadelphia, 155164 (1961)Google Scholar
20. Tamhane, A., Altynova, M. and Daehn, G. S., Scrpta Mater, 34, 1345–50 (1996)10.1016/1359-6462(95)00672-9Google Scholar
21. Datta, S., work in progress, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
22. Pandolfi, A., Krystl, P. and Ortiz, M., Int. J. of Fracture, 95, 279–97 (1999)10.1023/A:1018672922734Google Scholar
23. Balanethiram, V. S. and Daehn, G. S., Scripta Met et Mat, 30, 515–20 (1994)10.1016/0956-716X(94)90613-0Google Scholar
24. Balanethiram, V. S. and Daehn, G. S., Scripta Met et Mat, 27, 1783–88 (1992)10.1016/0956-716X(92)90019-BGoogle Scholar