Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-s9k8s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-11T18:17:20.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Impact of the Graphite Nanofiber Structure on the Behavior of Supported Nickel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

C. Park  and
R. T. K. Baker
C. Park
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115
R. T. K. Baker
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115
Get access

Abstract

In the current investigation we have used the hydrogenation of ethylene and crotonaldehyde as probe reactions in an attempt to follow any changes in catalytic behavior induced by supporting nickel on different types of graphite nanofiber support materials. The hydrogenation of the α,β-unsaturated aldehyde to the desired product, crotyl alcohol, is a particularly difficult task since there is a strong tendency to hydrogenate both the C=C and C=O in the reactant molecule. This study is designed to compare the catalytic behavior of the metal particles when dispersed on three types of nanofibers, where the orientation of the graphite platelets within the structures is significantly different in each case. The metal crystallites are located in such a manner that the majority of particles are in direct contact with graphite edge regions. For comparison purposes, the same set of hydrogenation reactions were carried out under similar conditions over γ-Al2O3 supported nickel particles.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 497: Symposium Z – Recent Advances in Catalytic Materials , 1997 , 145
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Rodriguez, N. M., J. Mater. Res. 8, 3233 (1993).Google Scholar
2. Rodriguez, N. M., Kim, M. S. and Baker, R. T. K., J. Phys. Chem. 98, 13108 (1994).10.1021/j100101a003Google Scholar
3. Chambers, A., Nemes, T., Rodriguez, N. M. and Baker, R. T. K., submitted to J. Phys. Chem.Google Scholar
4. Brownlie, I. C., Fryer, J. R. and Webb, G., J. Catal. 64, 263 (1969).Google Scholar
5. Gallezot, P., Richard, D., and Bergeret, G., in “Novel Materials in Heterogeneous Catalysis”, (Baker, R. T. K. and Murrell, L. L., Eds.) ACS Symposium Series, 437, 150 (1990).Google Scholar
6. Rodriguez, N. M., Chambers, A. and Baker, R. T. K., Langmuir 11, 3862 (1995).Google Scholar
7. Coloma, F., Sepulveda-Escribano, A. and Rodriguez-Reinoso, F., Appl. Catal. 150, 165 (1997).Google Scholar
8. Vannice, M. A., J. Mol. Catal. 59, 165 (1990).10.1016/0304-5102(90)85051-IGoogle Scholar
9. Delbecq, F. and Sautet, P., J. Catal. 142, 21 (1995).Google Scholar
10. English, M., Andeas, L. and Johannes, A., J. Catal. 166, 25 (1997).10.1006/jcat.1997.1494Google Scholar