Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-04T11:30:02.031Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Improved Thomson Coefficient Measurements Using an AC Method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2014

Yasutaka Amagai
Affiliation:
National Metrology Institute of Japan, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, 1-1-1 Umezono, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8563, Japan
Atsushi Yamamoto
Affiliation:
Energy Technology Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, 1-1-1 Umezono, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8568, Japan
Megumi Akoshima
Affiliation:
National Metrology Institute of Japan, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, 1-1-1 Umezono, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8563, Japan
Hiroyuki Fujiki
Affiliation:
National Metrology Institute of Japan, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, 1-1-1 Umezono, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8563, Japan
Get access

Abstract

We present an improved AC (Alternating Current) method for the determination of the Thomson coefficient, which can be used for obtaining the absolute Seebeck coefficient. While previous work has focused on DC (Direct Current) methods, we analyze the influence of an AC current in order to derive the Thomson coefficient of a thin wire from measurable quantities. Our expression requires five parameters including AC current, resistance, temperature gradient, and the temperature changes due to the Thomson and Joule effects. Thus, a prior determination of thermal conductivity and sample geometry is not required, unlike DC methods. In order to validate our analysis, the Thomson coefficient of a thin Pt wire has been measured at several frequencies. The results agree with those obtained from a conventional DC method.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Martin, J., Tritt, T., and Uher, C., J. Appl. Phys. 108, 121101 (2010).10.1063/1.3503505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uher, C., J. Appl. Phys, 62, 4636 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nettleton, H. R., Proc. Phys. Soc. 29, 59 (1916).Google Scholar
Borelius, G., Keesom, W. H., and Johansson, C. H., Commun. Phys. Lab. Univ. Leide 196a (1928).Google Scholar
Lander, J. J., Phys. Rev. 74, 479 (1948).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, R. B., Philos. Mag. 36 91 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, R. B., Philos. Mag. 43 1125 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, R. B., Righini, F., and Compton, R. C., Philos. Mag. 52 1147 (1985).10.1080/13642818508238957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, C. Y., Powell, R. W., and Liley, P. E., J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1, 279 (1972)10.1063/1.3253100CrossRefGoogle Scholar