Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T13:28:45.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Incorporation of “Corrosion-Time” and Effects of Corrosion-Product Spalling in Waste Package Degradation Simulation in the Potential Repository at Yucca Mountain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2012

Joon H. Lee
Affiliation:
INTERA, Inc., CRWMS M&O, 1180 Town Center Drive, Las Vegas, NV 89134, USA
Joel E. Atkins
Affiliation:
INTERA, Inc., CRWMS M&O, 1180 Town Center Drive, Las Vegas, NV 89134, USA
Bryan Dunlap
Affiliation:
INTERA, Inc., CRWMS M&O, 1180 Town Center Drive, Las Vegas, NV 89134, USA
Get access

Abstract

A two-layer waste package (carbon steel outer barrier and Alloy 825 inner barrier) is specified to dispose of high-level nuclear waste at the potential repository at Yucca Mountain. A set of improvements and more realism have been added to a stochastic waste-package degradation model which was developed for a recent total system performance assessment of the potential repository [1]. The waste-package surface is divided into “patches” to better represent the general corrosion of the carbon-steel outer barrier. The “corrosion-time” concept is developed to represent the corrosion of the carbon-steel outer barrier in changing exposure conditions with time such as those expected in the potential repository. With the patches approach and the corrosion-time concept implemented into the waste-package degradation model, sensitivity of the waste package degradation (failure and pitting degradation) to different threshold spalling thicknesses of the corrosion products from the carbon-steel outer barrier is analyzed. The results show that the waste-package pitting degradation is sensitive to the corrosion-products spalling thickness of the carbon-steel outer barrier. A greater pitting degradation of the waste packages is predicted with a smaller spalling thickness. Further understanding of the corrosion-products spalling in different exposure conditions (i.e., water chemistry, water contact mode, etc.) and its effects on carbon steel corrosion is needed to enhance the confidence in the waste-package performance modeling in the potential repository.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. CRWMS M&O, Total System Performance Assessment-1995: An Evaluation of the Potential Yucca Mountain Repository, B00000000–01717–2200–00136, Rev. 01, Las Vegas, Nevada, 1995.Google Scholar
2. CRWMS M&O, Controlled Design Assumption Document, B00000000–01717–4600–00032, Rev. 04, Las Vegas, Nevada, 1996.Google Scholar
3. Lee, J.H., Atkins, J.E., and Andrews, R.W., Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIX, Mat. Res. Soc. Proc, 412, Murphy, W.M. and Knecht, D.A. (eds.), p. 603 (1996).Google Scholar
4. Lee, J.H., Atkins, J.E., and Andrews, R.W., Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIX, Mat. Res. Soc. Proc, 412, Murphy, W.M. and Knecht, D.A. (eds.), p. 571 (1996).Google Scholar
5. Andrews, R.W., Dale, T.F., and McNeish, J.A., Total System Performance Assessment-1993: An Evaluation of the Potential Yucca Mountain Repository, B00000000–01717–2200–00099-Rev. 01, CRWMS M&O, Las Vegas, Nevada, 1994.Google Scholar
6. McCright, R.D., Engineered Materials Characterization Report for the Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project. Vol. 3: Corrosion Data and Modeling, Rev. 1, UCRL-ID-119564, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, 1997.Google Scholar
7. Standard Practice for Conducting Atmospheric Corrosion Tests on Metals, ASTM G50–76, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 03.02, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 1992.Google Scholar
8. Atkins, J.E., Lee, J.H., and Andrews, R.W., Proc. 7th Int'l Conf. High Level Radioactive Waste Management, p. 459 (1996).Google Scholar
9. McCright, R.D., Galvanized Effects in Multi-Barrier Waste Package Containers, personal communication to J.H. Lee, July 12, 1995.Google Scholar
10. Vernon, W.H., Trans. Electro. Soc, 64, p. 31 (1933).Google Scholar
11. Raman, A., and Nasrazadani, S., Corrosion, 46, p. 601 (1990).Google Scholar
12. Fyfe, D., Corrosion, 3rd ed., Shreir, L.L., et al. (eds.), Vol. 1, Butterworth-Heinemann, p. 2:31 (1994).Google Scholar
13. Gdowski, G.E. and Estill, J.C., Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIX, Mat. Res. Soc. Proc 412, Murphy, W.M. and Knecht, D.A. (eds.), p. 533 (1996).Google Scholar
14. Estill, J.C. and Gdowski, G.E., Proc 7th Int'l Conf. High Level Radioactive Waste Management, p. 457 (1996).Google Scholar
15. Nitao, J.J., User's Manual for the USNT Module of the NUFT Code. Version 1.0, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, 1996.Google Scholar
16. US DOE, Yucca Mountain Project Reference Information Base, YMP/CC-0002, V. 04.002, Las Vegas, NV, 1990.Google Scholar
17. CRWMS M&O, Drift-Scale Thermo-Hvdrologv Analvsis/Effects Report, BA00000000–01717–2200–0083, Las Vegas, NV, 1996.Google Scholar
18. Strutt, J.E., Nicholls, J.R., and Barbier, B., Corr. Sci., 25, p. 305 (1985).Google Scholar
19. Marsh, G.P., and Taylor, K.J., Corr. Sci., 28, p. 289 (1988).Google Scholar
20. Henshall, G.A., Modeling Pitting Degradation of Corrosion Resistant Alloys, UCRL-ID-125300, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, 1996.Google Scholar
21. Lee, J.H., Atkins, J.E., McNeish, J.A., and Valiikat, V., Proc. 1996 Int'l Conf. Deep Geological Disposal of Radioactive Waste, p. 865 (1996).Google Scholar
22. Lee, J.H., Chambre, P.L., and Andrews, R.W., Proc 1996 Int'l Conf. Deep Geological Disposal of Radioactive Waste, p. 561 (1996).Google Scholar
23. Lee, J.H., this volume.Google Scholar