Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-08-07T11:13:19.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Initial Results from Dissolution Testing of Various Air-Oxidized Spent Fuels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

W. J. Gray
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest Laboratory, P.O. Box 999. Richland, WA 99352
L. E. Thomas
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest Laboratory, P.O. Box 999. Richland, WA 99352
Get access

Abstract

Flowthrough dissolution tests have been conducted on two different light-water-reactor spent fuels oxidized to U4O9+x or U3O8. Oxidation had a bigger impact on the dissolution of U and a smaller impact on the dissolution of Tc from the fuel with higher burnup and higher fission gas release. Possible reasons for the observed differences in test results are discussed, but clarification awaits results from tests on other fuels, which are in progress.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Gray, W. J., Thomas, L. E., and Einziger, R. E., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XVI, edited by Interrante, C. G. and Pabalan, R. T. (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, 1993), 294, pp. 4754.Google Scholar
2 Einziger, R. E., Thomas, L. E., Buchanan, H. C., and Stout, R. B., J. Nucl. Mater. 190, 53 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 Thomas, L. E., Einziger, R. E., and Woodley, R. E., J. Nucl. Mater. 166, 243 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 Guenther, R. J., et al. Characterization of Spent Fuel Approved Testing Material - ATM-105, PNL-5109-105, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 Guenther, R. J., et al. Characterization of Spent Fuel Approved Testing Material - ATM-106, PNL-5109-106, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 Gray, W. J., Leider, H. R., and Steward, S. A., J. Nucl. Mater. 190, 46 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7 Thomas, L. E. and Chariot, L. A., Ceram. Trans. 9, 397 (1990).Google Scholar
8 Gray, W. J., Strachan, D. M., and Wilson, C. N., in Scientific Basis for Nucl. Waste Management XV, edited by Sombret, C. G. (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, 1992), 257, pp. 353360.Google Scholar
9 Migge, H., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XII, edited by Lutze, W. and Ewing, R. C. (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, 1989), 127, pp. 205213.Google Scholar
10 Johnson, L. H. and Shoesmith, D. W., “Spent Fuel,” Chapter 11 in Radioactive Waste Forms for the Future, edited by Lutze, W. and Ewing, R. C. (North-Holland Publishers, New York, 1988).Google Scholar