Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T19:32:49.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interactions, Dynamics and Self-assembly of Magnetic Holes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Kai de lang Kristiansen
Affiliation:
k.d.l.kristiansen@fys.uio.no, Institute for Energy Technology, Physics Department, Kjeller, NO-2027, Norway
Eldrid Svåsand
Affiliation:
Eldrid.Svasand@ife.no, Institute for Energy Technology, Physics Department, Kjeller, NO-2027, Norway
Geir Helgesen
Affiliation:
geir.helgesen@ife.no, Institute for Energy Technology, Physics Department, Kjeller, NO-2027, Norway
Arne T. Skjeltorp
Affiliation:
arne.skjeltorp@ife.no, Institute for Energy Technology, Physics Department, Kjeller, NO-2027, Norway
Get access

Abstract

Nonmagnetic microspheres dispersed in a ferrofluid are denoted magnetic holes. When the spheres are confined to a monolayer between two plane, parallel plates and subjected to AC magnetic fields, they show a variety of dynamical behaviors and assemblages. The magnetic interactions between the particles and their dynamical behavior are influenced by the boundaries and the degree of confinement. We have derived analytical results for the pair-wise competing interactions, and these compare favorably with experimental results.

It is also possible to characterize the self-assembly and dynamics of the spheres by the theory of braids. It involves classifying different ways of tracing curves in space. The essentially two-dimensional motion of a sphere can be represented as a curve in a three-dimensional space-time diagram, and so several spheres in motion produce a set of braided curves. The dynamical modes can then be described in terms of braid-words. We also present a few other examples on how this system can be used to study dynamical processes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Skjeltorp, A.T., Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 2306 (1983).Google Scholar
2. Ugelstad, J., Mørk, P. C., Kaggerud, K. Herder, Ellingsen, T., Berge, A., Adv. Colloid Int. Sci. 13, 101 (1980).Google Scholar
3. GmbH, Ferrofluidics, Gestade, Hohes 14, 72622 Nürtingen, Germany.Google Scholar
4. Toussaint, R., Akselvoll, J., Helgesen, G., Skjeltorp, A.T., and Flekkøy, E.G., Phys. Rev. E 69, 011407 (2004).Google Scholar
5. Kristiansen, K. d. L., Helgesen, G., and Skjeltorp, A.T., Eur. Phys. J. B 51, 363 (2006).Google Scholar
6. Mandelbrot, B. B., The Fractal Geometry of Nature (W. H. Freeman, New York, 1982).Google Scholar
7. Zipf, G. K., Human Behavior and The Principle of Least Effort (Addison-Wesley Press, Massachusetts, 1949).Google Scholar
8. Svåsand, E., Skjeltorp, A.T., Akselvoll, J., Helgesen, G., J. Appl. Phys. 101, 054910 (2007).Google Scholar
9. Cernak, J., Helgesen, G., and Skjeltorp, A.T., Phys. Rev. E 70, 031504 (2004).Google Scholar