Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-24T12:16:44.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Light-induced Annealing of Deep Defects in Low Ge Fraction a-Si,Ge:H Alloys: Further Insights into the Fundamentals of Light-induced Degradation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

J.David Cohen
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, U.S.A.
Jennifer Heath
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, U.S.A.
Kimon C. Palinginis
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, U.S.A.
Jeffrey C. Yang
Affiliation:
United Solar Systems Corp., 1100 W. Maple Road, Troy, MI 48084, U.S.A.
Subhendu Guha
Affiliation:
United Solar Systems Corp., 1100 W. Maple Road, Troy, MI 48084, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Modulated photocurrent (MPC) was employed to study metastable deep defect creation and annealing in low Ge fraction a-Si,Ge:H alloys (Ge fractions below 10at.%). These MPC spectra reveal two distinct bands of deep defects identified as neutral Si and neutral Ge dangling bonds. Upon heating in the dark from a strongly light degraded state, these are reduced in direct competition to each other, therefore implying a global reconfiguration mechanism. We have extended our studies to compare purely thermal annealing with light-induced annealing in these alloys. We have found that the relative anneal rate for the two types of defects differs from the case of purely thermal annealing. This therefore tends to rule out models in which the rate limiting step during annealing comes from the release of the mediating entity from a remote site.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Staebler, D.L., and Wronski, C.R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 31, 292 (1977).10.1063/1.89674Google Scholar
2. Palinginis, K.C., Cohen, J.D., Yang, J.C., and Guha, S., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 266–269, 665 (2000).Google Scholar
3. Palinginis, K.C., Cohen, J.D., Yang, J.C., and Guha, S., Phys. Rev. B, in press.Google Scholar
4.For a recent discussion of some such models see Tanaka, K., Maruyama, E., Shimada, T., and Okamoto, H., Amorphous Silicon, (Wiley, Chichester, 1999) pp. 194208.Google Scholar
5. Branz, H.M., Phys. Rev. B59, 5498 (1999).Google Scholar
6. Guha, S., Payson, J.S., Agarwal, S.C., and Ovshinsky, S.R.,. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 97&98, 1455 (1988).Google Scholar
7. Chapman, Brandon D. et al. , Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 46, 324 (2001).Google Scholar
8. Brüggemann, R., Main, C. Berkin, J., and Reynolds, S., Philos. Mag. B62, 29 (1990).Google Scholar
9. Michelson, C.E., Gelatos, A.V., and Cohen, J.D., Appl. Phys. Lett. 47, 412 (1985).Google Scholar
10. Schumm, G. and Bauer, G.H., Phys. Rev. B39, 5311 (1989).Google Scholar
11. Cohen, J.D., and Kwon, D., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 227–230, 348 (1998).Google Scholar
12. Wu, Z.Y., , Siefert, and Equer, B., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 137&138, 227 (1991).Google Scholar
13. Meaudra, R. and Meaudre, M., Phys. Rev. B45, 12134 (1992).Google Scholar
14. Stutzmann, M., Jackson, W. B., Tsai, C.-C, Phys. Rev. B32, 23 (1985)Google Scholar
15.See, for example, Gleskova, H. and Wagner, S., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 190, 157 (1995).Google Scholar