Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T16:28:37.447Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Magnetic Properties of Sputtered Fe-O and Co-O Thin Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

D. V. Dimitrov
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716
A. S. Murthy
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716
G. C. Hadjipanayis
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716
C. P. SWANN
Affiliation:
Bartol Research Institute Newark, DE 19716
Get access

Abstract

Fe-O and Co-O films were prepared by DC magnetron sputtering in a mixture of Ar and O2 gases. By varying the oxygen to argon ratio, oxide films with stoichiometry FeO, Fe3O4, α-Fe2O3, CoO and Co3O4 were produced. TEM studies showed that the Fe – oxide films were polycrystalline consisting of small almost spherical grains, about 10 nm in size. Co-O films had different microstructure with grain size and shape dependent on the amount of oxygen. X-ray diffraction studies showed that the grains in Fe-O films were randomly oriented in contrast to Co-O films in which a <111> texture was observed. Pure FeO and α-Fe2O3 films were found to be superparamagnetic at room temperature but strongly ferromagnetic at low temperatures in contrast to the antiferromagnetic nature of bulk samples. A very large shift in the hysteresis loop, about 3800 Oe, was observed in field cooled Co-CoO films indicating the presence of a large unidirectional exchange anisotropy.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Kim, Y.K. and Oliveria, M., J.Appl.Phys. 75, 431 (1994)Google Scholar
2. Zhou, Zeng-Jun and Yan, Jun-Jue, , J.M.M.M, 115, 8798 (1992)Google Scholar
3. W.H., Meiklejohn and C.P., Bean, Phys.Rev., 102, 1413 (1956)Google Scholar
4. J.M.M.M, B. Dieny 136 335359, (1994)Google Scholar
5. Kouvel, J.S., J.Phys.Chem.Solids 21, 57 (1961)Google Scholar
6. Imry, Y. and Ma, S.K., Phys.Rev.Lett. 35, 1399 (1975)Google Scholar
7. Schlenker, C., Parkin, S.S.P., Scott, J.C., and Howard, J.K., J.Magn.Magn.Mater, 54–57, 801 (1986).Google Scholar
8. Malozemoff, A.P., Phys.Rev.B 33 (7) (3689 (1987)Google Scholar
9. Gangopadhyay, S., Hadjipanayis, G.C., Shah, S.I., Sorensen, C.M., Klaubunde, K.M., Papaefthymiou, V., Kostikas, A., J.Appl.Phys. 70, 5888 (1991)Google Scholar
10. Moran, T.J., Gallego, J.M. and Schuller, Ivan K. J.Appl.Phys submitted for publication II. S. Gangopadhyay Ph.D Thesis, University of Delaware, (1993)Google Scholar
12. Neel, L., J.Phys.Soc.Japan Suppl.B-I, 17 676 (1962)Google Scholar
13. Zhou, Z.J. and Yan, J.J., , J.M.M.M 115, 8798 (1992)Google Scholar
14. Ohta, S. and Terada, A. Thin Solid Films, 143, 7382 (1986)Google Scholar