Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T05:27:16.005Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Maskless Laser Etching of Alumina and Ceramic Substrates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Jamal Khan
Jamal Khan*
Affiliation:
Digital Equipment Corporation, Shrewsbury, MA 01545.
Get access

Abstract

Maskless patterning of alumina (A12O3) films of various thicknesses and ceramic (TiC-Al2O3) substrate material was accomplished by using pulsed excimer and Nd:YAG laser systems. Etched structure size was defined through the computer software which also controls the workpiece position and laser operating parameters. Etch profile, materials removal rate and surface roughness was found to be dependent on laser emission wavelength, fluence, pulse rate and relative scan speed. Smoother etching was obtained with the excimer lasers. The etch characteristics are compared with those of the polymeric and metallic materials. Various potential applications of this laser based etching process in microelectronic and micromagnetic device fabrication are identified.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 201: Symposium A – Surface Chemistry and Beam-Solid Interactions , 1990 , 465
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Louh, R.F. and Buchanon, R., J. Mater. Res. 5, 841 (1990).Google Scholar
2. Schuette, R., Hybrid Circuit Technology 6, 50–52 (1989)Google Scholar
3. McDermott, T.K., Hybrid Circuit Technology 5, 20–21 (1988).Google Scholar
4. Ito, S., Nakamura, M. and Kanematsu, W., Bull. Jpn. Soc. Precis. Eng. 21(3), 167–172 (1987).Google Scholar
5. Frye, R.W. and Polk, D.H., Proceedings of ICALEO ‘85, 137–144 (1986).Google Scholar
6. Byrum, J.E. and Duryea, H., Proc. IEPS, 373–382 (1984).Google Scholar
7. Morita, N., Ishida, S., Fujimori, Y. and Ishikawa, K., Appl. Phys. Lett. 52, 1965 (1988).Google Scholar
8. von Gutfeld, R.J. and Hodgson, R.J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 40, 352 (1982).Google Scholar
9. Das, S.C. and Khan, J. in Magnetic Materials, Processes, and Devices, Edited by Romankiw, L.T. and Herman, D.A. Jr., (Electrochem. Soc. Proc. 90–8, Hollywood, FL 1989) pp. 279–288 Google Scholar
10.J. Appl. Phys. 67(9), 4860 (1990).Google Scholar
11. Baren, B. and Srinivasan, R., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 6, 537 (1988).Google Scholar
12. Ehrlich, D.J., Tsao, J.Y. and Bolzer, C.O., J.Vac. Sci. Technol. B 3, 1 (1985).Google Scholar
13. Loper, G.L. and Tabat, M.D., J. Appl. Phys. Lett. 58, 3649 (1985)Google Scholar
14.Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 75, 385 (1987).Google Scholar
15. Donnelly, V.M. and Mucha, J.A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 54, 1567 (1989).Google Scholar
16. Yamazaki, S., Mase, A. and Sakayori, H., U.S. Patent No. 4 786 358 (1987).Google Scholar
17. IBM Tech. Disc. Bull. 28, 1105 (1985).Google Scholar
18. Riche, J.H.H. in Proceedings of the 1984 International Symposium on Microelectronics, 1984, 377.Google Scholar
19. Strom, R.A., U.S. Patent Nos. 4 785 161 (1988) and 4 802 042 (1989).Google Scholar