Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-s9k8s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-16T20:58:05.723Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Measurement of Plasma Etch-Induced Damage to Silicon Beneath Si0 2 Layer: Effective Range of Plasma Etch Damage Through Si0 2

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

W. Lee Smith
Affiliation:
Therma-Wave, Inc., 47734 Westinghouse Dr., Fremont, CA 94539
I-Wen Huang Connick
Affiliation:
Philips Research Laboratories Sunnyvale, Signetics Corp., 440 Wolfe Rd., Sunnyvale, CA 94088
Get access

Abstract

The ability to pattern VLSI wafers by plasma etching through SiO2 without causing structural damage and chemical contamination to the underlying silicon material is today highly desired. Examples are the plasma etching of metal/silicon contact holes and the fabrication of charge injection windows for EEPROM devices. Damage to underlying silicon, which may adversely affect contact resistance, oxide breakdown or charge retention properties, occurs as the oxide is reduced in thickness below a certain penetration depth (Dox). Dox is the effective projected range of damage-producing particles in Si0 2, and is a function of the distributions of energy, mass, etc., of the plasma constituents. In this paper we describe the use of thermal wave modulated reflectance in conjunction with a simple tapered-oxide film structure to measure the depth of penetration of etch-induced damage through SiO 2. Results on the dependence of the penetration depth on RIE self-bias voltage and other observations of etch-induced surface modifications are reported.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFRENCES

1. Faith, T.J, O'Neil, J.J. Jr, Irven, R.S., Vossen, J.L., Shaw, J.M. and Thomas, J.H. III, J. Electrochem. Soc. 134, 665 (1987).Google Scholar
2. Malazgirt, A. and Smith, W.L., Paper K3.8 in Symp. on Plasma Processing and Synthesis, Mater. Res. Soc. Spring Meeting, Anaheim, CA, April 1987.Google Scholar
3. Bhattacharyya, A., Brill, T., Vorset, C. and Westlund, B., J. Electrochem. Soc. 133, 1670 (1986).Google Scholar
4. Fonash, S.J., Sol. State Tech., April 1985, p. 201.Google Scholar
5. Chien, H.-C. and Ashok, S., J. Appl. Phys. 60, 2886 (1986).Google Scholar
6. Geraghty, P. and Smith, W.L., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 68, 387 (1986).Google Scholar
7. Huang Connick, I-W. and Smith, W.L., Paper K3.11 in Symp. on Plasma Processing and Synthesis, Mater. Res. Soc. Spring Meeting, Anaheim, CA, April 1987.Google Scholar
8. Rosencwaig, A., Opsal, J., Smith, W.L. and Willenborg, D., Appl. Phys. Lett. 46, 1013 (1985).Google Scholar
9. Smith, W.L., Rosencwaig, A., Willenborg, D.L., Opsal, J. and Taylor, M., Sol. State Tech., January 1986, p. 85.Google Scholar
10. Opsal, J., Taylor, M.W., Smith, W.L. and Rosencwaig, A., J. Appl. Phys. 61, 240 (1987).Google Scholar