Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-qxsvm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-06T19:21:36.271Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Metal-Matrix Corrosion Studies in Canadian Shield Granitic Groundwaters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

P. Mani Mathew
Affiliation:
Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Whiteshell Nuclear Research Establishment, Pinawa, Manitoba, Canada ROE ILO
Paul A. Krueger
Affiliation:
Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Whiteshell Nuclear Research Establishment, Pinawa, Manitoba, Canada ROE ILO
Get access

Abstract

The Canadian Nuclear Fuel Waste Management program is evaluating two basic supported-shell container concepts for used-fuel immobilization.

One concept uses a compacted particulate material within the container to sunport a thin, corroston-resistant shell. The other concept, called “the metal-matrix concept”, uses a cast-in-place metal matrix for shell support.

This paper describes corrosion studies on the candidate matrix materials, lead, zinc and aluminum-7 wt.7 Si (A1-7 wt.7 Si), in the temperature range 293 to 423 K and the dissolved oxygen content range 8 to 410 mg/L. Test specimens were analyzed for general and localized corrosion and the corrosion products were identified.

The results showed that, unlike lead, zinc and Al-7 wt.% Si are susceptible to localized corrosion. Lead showed only low general corrosion rates of 2 to 83 pm/a compared with zinc (36 to 15800 μm/a) and Al-7 wt.% Si (6 to 209 μm/a) in the above temperature and oxygen content ranges. Maximum pit depths of about 0.9 mm on Al-7 wt.% Si and 0.6 mm on zinc were observed. These results indicate that, of the candidate matrix metals studied, lead has the greatest potential to retard radionuclide release from used-fuel disposal containers.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Hancox, W.T., “Progress in the Canadian Nuclear Fuel Waste Management Program,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Radioactive Waste Management, Winnipeg, Canadian Nuclear Society (1986).Google Scholar
2. Nuttall, K., Crosthwaite, J.L., McKay, P., Mathew, P.M., Teper, B., Maak, P.Y.Y. and Moles, M.D.C., “The Canadian Container Development Program for Fuel Isolation, in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management, edited by Brookins, D.G., (Materials Research Society, Boston, 1982) p. 677.Google Scholar
3. Mathew, P.M., “Investigations on Metal Matrices for Nuclear Fuel Waste Disposal,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Radioactive Waste Management, Winnipeg, Canadian Nuclear Society (1986).Google Scholar
4. Sunder, S., Shoesmith, D.W., Bailey, M.G. and Wallace, G.J., “Mechanism of Oxidative Dissolution of UO2 Under Waste Disposal Vault Conditions,” in Proceedings of International Conference on Radioactive Waste Management, Winnipeg, Canadian Nuclear Society (1986).Google Scholar
5. Mathew, P.M., Nadeau, J.S., Weinberg, F., Chaklader, A.C.D. and Nuttall, K., “Investment of Irradiated Reactor Fuel in a Metal Matrix,” Canadian Metallurgical Quarterly 22, 107 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Gascoyne, M., Davison, C.C., Ross, J.D. and Pearson, R., “Saline Groundwaters and Brines in Plutons in the Canadian Shield,” to be published in Brines and Gases in Crystalline Rock, edited by Fritz, P. an Frape, S.K. (Geological Association of Canada, Special Publication, 1986).Google Scholar
7. Johnson, L.R., 1985, unpublished data.Google Scholar
8. Thompson, D.H., in Handbook on Corrosion Testing and Evaluation, edited by Aidor, W.H. (Wiley, New York, 1971), p. 115.Google Scholar
9. Uhlig, H.R., Corrosion and Corrosion Control, 2nd edition (Wiley, New York, 1971) p. 334.Google Scholar
10. Richard, D.T. and Nriagu, J.O., in The Biogeochemistry of Lead in the Environment edited by Nrlagu, J.O. (Elsevier, New York, 1978) p. 219.Google Scholar