Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-xq9c7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-07T04:37:44.304Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Microstructure and Magnetic Properties of Co-CoO Nanocomposite Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Jae-Young Yi
Affiliation:
Material Science and Engineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, U.S.A
G. A. Hirata
Affiliation:
CCMC-UNAM, Ensenada, B.C., 22860, Mexico
M. L. Rudee
Affiliation:
Material Science and Engineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, U.S.A
Get access

Abstract

The effect of exchange anisotropy on nanosize Co particles was studied in Co-CoO nanocomposite thin films for possible applications for magnetic storage media. XRD analyses showed nanosize hcp Co particles and (111) textured CoO phase. A broken columnar structure was observed in cross-section TEM images. Very large room temperature coercivity (∼1 kOe) was observed and believed to be due to a shape effect and possible local exchange coupling. Large exchange anisotropy at low temperatures and linear type temperature dependence were explained by finite size effects and thermal relaxation of the CoO particles. A slow decrease of thermoremanent moment (TRM) with temperature and large TRM at room temperature indicated that the exchange anisotropy significantly modified the anisotropy energy barrier of the Co crystallites in the CoO matrix. The results indicated that the exchange anisotropy could be used to stabilize nanosize ferromagnetic particles.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Lu, P. L. and Charap, S. H., J. Appl. Phys. 75, 5768 (1994)Google Scholar
2. Lu, P. L. and Charap, S. H., IEEE Trans. Magn. 30 (6), 4230 (1994)Google Scholar
3. Moser, A. and Weller, D., IEEE Trans. Magn. 35 (5), 2808 (1999)Google Scholar
4. Weller, D. and Moser, A., IEEE Trans. Magn. 35 (6), 4423 (1999)Google Scholar
5. Weller, D., Moser, A., Folks, L., Best, M. E., Wen Lee, Toney, M. F., Schwickert, M., Thiele, J. -U., Doerner, M. F., IEEE Trans. Magn. 36 (1), 10 (2000)Google Scholar
6. Meiklejohn, W. H. and Bean, C. P., Phys. Rev. 105 (3), 904 (1957)Google Scholar
7. Takano, K., Kodama, R. H., Berkowitz, A. E., Cao, W. and Gareth, G., Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1130 (1997)Google Scholar
8. Néel, L., Comp. Rend. Acad. Sci. 252, p. 4075 (1961); 253, p. 9, 203 (1961); 254, 598 (1962)Google Scholar
9. Schuele, W. J. and Deetscreek, V. D., J. Appl. Phys. 33 (3), suppl., 1136 (1962)Google Scholar