Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-09T17:17:53.300Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Microstructure and Magnetostriction of Rapidly-solidified Fe-Ga System Alloy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Teiko Okazaki
Affiliation:
Faculty of Science and Technology, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki 036–8651, Japan
Yasubumi Furuya
Affiliation:
Faculty of Science and Technology, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki 036–8651, Japan
Chihiro Saito
Affiliation:
Faculty of Science and Technology, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki 036–8651, Japan
Takashi Matsuzaki
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, Sendai 980–8579, Japan
Tadao Watanabe
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, Sendai 980–8579, Japan
Manfred Wuttig
Affiliation:
Department of Materials and Nuculear Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742–2115, USA
Get access

Abstract

Rapid-solidification method was applied to make Fe-15at%Ga and Fe-17at%Ga ribbons of 100 μm thickness. These ribbons have large magnetostriction of 270 ppm, where the coercive force exhibits a maximum value. The phenomenon is related to special metallic texture, that is, the ribbon has strongly [001]-oriented textured fine columnar microstructure with grain size of 2∼5 μm. The ribbon has little-hysteresis loop of magnetostriction and a good ductility (i.e., full bending is possible). Rapid-solidified Fe-Ga alloy has a promising possibility as a new magnetic-induced sensor/actuator material.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Clark, A.E., in Ferromagnetic Materials, edited by Wohlfarth, E. P. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1980) pp. 531.Google Scholar
2. James, R.D. and Wuttig, M., Philos. Mag. A77, 1273 (1998).10.1080/01418619808214252Google Scholar
3. O'Handley, R.C., Murray, S.J., Marioni, M., Nemback, H. and Allen, S.M., J. Appl. Phys., 87, 4712 (2000).10.1063/1.373136Google Scholar
4. Clark, A.E., Wun-Fogle, M., Restroff, J.B., Ross, T.A. and Schlagel, D.L., in Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on New Actuators, edited by Borgmann, H. (Messe Breman GmbH, Bremen, Germany, 2000) pp. 111115.Google Scholar
5. Srisukhumbowornchai, N. and Guruswamy, S., J. Appl. Phis., 90, 56805688 (2001).10.1063/1.1412840Google Scholar
6. Furuya, Y., Hood, N.W., Kimura, H. and Watanabe, T.: Mater. Trans. JIM 39, 12481254 (1998).10.2320/matertrans1989.39.1248Google Scholar
7. Kubota, T., Okazaki, T. and Furuya, Y.: Mag, J.. Mag. Mater., 65, 10531056 (2001).Google Scholar
8. Furuya, Y., Saito, C. and Okazaki, T.: J. Japan Inst. Metals, 66, 901904(2002).10.2320/jinstmet1952.66.9_901Google Scholar
9. Cheng, S. F., Das, B. N., Wun-Fogle, M., Lubitz, P., and Clark, A. E.: IEEE Trans. on Mag., 38, 28382840(2002).10.1109/TMAG.2002.802470Google Scholar