Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-68ccn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T11:16:24.152Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Microstructure of Brachiopod Shells - An Inorganic/Organic Fibre Composite with Nanocrystalline Protective Layer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

E. Griesshaber ,
W. Schmahl ,
R. Neuser ,
R. Job ,
M. Bluem  and
U. Brand
E. Griesshaber
Affiliation:
University of Bochum, Department of Geology, Mineralogy and Geophysics, Bochum, Germany
W. Schmahl
Affiliation:
University of Bochum, Department of Geology, Mineralogy and Geophysics, Bochum, Germany
R. Neuser
Affiliation:
University of Bochum, Department of Geology, Mineralogy and Geophysics, Bochum, Germany
R. Job
Affiliation:
University of Hagen, Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, Hagen, Germany
M. Bluem
Affiliation:
University of Bochum, Department of Material Science, Bochum, Germany
U. Brand
Affiliation:
Brock University, Department of Earth Sciences, Brock University, St. Catharines, Canada
Get access

Abstract

We investigated the ultrastructure of the modern calcitic brachiopods Megerlia truncata (Linnaeus) and Terebratalia transversa (Sowerby) with SEM, electron backscattering diffraction and microhardness indentation. The outer, primary shell layer can be regarded as a nanocrystalline thin film that forms a hard protective coating around the inner, much softer secondary layer that can be expressed as an inorganic/organic fibre composite. The fibrous, curved growth of the secondary shell layer crystals occurs in arbitrary directions perpendicular to the <0 0 0 1> triad symmetry direction of calcite and is most likely obtained by simple confinement to a protein sheath rather than by biomolecular adsorbates blocking growth of any specific crystal face. The curvature of the fibres is caused by rearrangements of the secreting cell array during growth, whereby the existing crystal lattice is not distorted. It serves as a substrate for continued crystal growth. Thus biologically mediated calcite crystallization is a purposeful process and seems to be significantly different to the inorganic crystallization of calcite.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 844: Symposium Y – Mechanical Properties of Bio-Inspired and Biological Materials , 2004 , Y9.3
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Crick, R., Origin, Evolution and Modern Aspects of Biomineralization in Plants and Animals, Plenum Press (1989).Google Scholar
2. Carter, J., Skeletal Biomineralization: Patterns, Processes and Evolutionary Trends, van Nostrand (1990).Google Scholar
3. Suga, N., Mechanisms and Phylogeny of Mineralization in Biological Systems, Springer Verlag (1991).Google Scholar
4. Williams, A., Biol. Rev. 31, 261 (1956).Google Scholar
5. Rudwick, M., Geol. Mag. 96, 1 (1959).Google Scholar
6. Williams, A., Spec. Pap. Pal. 2, 1 (1968).Google Scholar
7. Williams, A., Wright, A., Spec. Pap. Pal. 7, 1 (1970).Google Scholar
8. Williams, A., in: Carter, J. (ed.): Skeletal Biomineralization: Patterns, Processes and Evolutionary Trends, van Nostrand (1990), p. 67.Google Scholar
9. Gaspard, D., in: Kobayashi, I., Mutvei, H., Sahni, A. (ed.): Structure, Formation and Evolution of Fossil Hard Tissues, Tokai Univ. Press, Tokyo, 21 (1993).Google Scholar
10. Mackay, S., Mackinnon, D., Williams, A., Lethia 4, 367 (1993).Google Scholar
11. Samtleben, C., Munnecke, A., Bickert, T., Paetzold, J., Chem. Geol. 175, 61 (2001).Google Scholar
12. Prior, D., Boyle, A., Brenker, F., Cheadle, M., Day, A., Lopez, G., Peruzzo, L., Potts, G., Reddy, S., Spiess, R., Trimby, P., Wheeler, J., Zetterstroem, L., Am. Min. 84, 1741 (1999).Google Scholar
13. Chateigner, D., Hedegaard, C., Wenk, H.-R., J. Struct. Geol. 22, 1723 (2000).Google Scholar
14. Adams, B., Wright, S., Kunze, K., Metall. Transact. 24A, 819 (1993).Google Scholar
15. Prior, D., Wheeler, J., Peruzzo, L., Spess, R., Storey, C., J. Struct. Geol. 24, 999 (2002).Google Scholar
16. Grossman, E., Mii, H.-S., Zhang, C., Yancey, T., J. Sed. Res. 66, 1011 (1996).Google Scholar
17. Veizer, J., Ala, D., Azmy, K., Bruckschen, P., Buhl, D., Bruhn, F., Carden, G., Diener, A., Ebneth, S., Godderis, Y., Jasper, T., Korte, C., Pawellek, F., Podlaha, O., Strauss, H., Chem. Geol. 161, 59 (1999).Google Scholar
18. Brand, U., Logan, A., Hiller, N., Richardson, J., Chem. Geol. 198, 305 (2003).Google Scholar
19. Schmahl, W., Griesshaber, E., Neuser, R., Lenze, A., Job, R., Brand, U., Eur. J. Mineral. 16, 693 (2004).Google Scholar