Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-5lx2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-04T13:22:21.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Microstructure/Oxidation/Microhardness Correlations in γ-Based And ツ-Based Ai-Ti-Cr Alloys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

Michael P. Brady ,
J. L. Smialek  and
D. L. Humphrey
Michael P. Brady
Affiliation:
NASA Lewis Research Center, MS 106–1, Cleveland, OH 44135
J. L. Smialek
Affiliation:
NASA Lewis Research Center, MS 106–1, Cleveland, OH 44135
D. L. Humphrey
Affiliation:
NASA Lewis Research Center, MS 106–1, Cleveland, OH 44135
Get access

Abstract

The relationships between alloy microstructure and air oxidation kinetics and alloy microstructure and microhardness in the Al-Ti-Cr system for exposures at 800°C and 1000°C were investigated. The relevant phases were identified as τ (Ll2), γ (Ll0), r-Al2Ti, TiCrAl (laves), and Cr2Al. Protective alumina formation was associated with τ, Al-rich TiCrAl, and γ/TiCrAl mixtures. Brittleness was associated with the TiCrAl phase and τ decomposition to Al2Ti + Cr2Al. It was concluded that two-phase γ + TiCrAl alloys offer the greatest potential for oxidation resistance and room temperature ductility in the Al-Ti-Cr system.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 364: Symposium L – High-Temperature Ordered Intermetallic Alloys–VI , 1994 , 1309
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Meier, G.H., Perkins, R.A., Schaeffer, J.C., and McCarron, R. L., GE Aircraft Engines Interim Report No. 1, Naval Air Development Center Contract N62269–90–C–0287 (March 1991).Google Scholar
2. Perkins, R.A. and Meier, G.H., in Proceedings of the Industry-University Advanced Materials Conference II, Smith, F. ed., Advanced Materials Institute, p. 92 (1989).Google Scholar
3. McKee, D.W. and Huang, S.C., Cor. Sci., 33, p. 1899 (1992).Google Scholar
4. Brady, M.P., Smialek, J.L., and Terepka, F., submitted to Scripta Met. (Sept. 1994).Google Scholar
5. Brady, M.P., Smialek, J.L., and Humphrey, D.L., NASA Lewis 1994 HITEMP Review, 2, pp. 45–1 to 45–11 (1994).Google Scholar
6. Klansky, J.L., Nic, J.P., and Mikkola, D.E., J. Mater. Res., 9, p. 255 (1994).Google Scholar
7. Meier, G.H., Birks, N., Pettit, F.S., Perkins, R.A., and Grabke, H.J., in Structural Intermetallics, Darolia, R., Lewandowski, J.J., Liu, C.T., Martin, P.L., Miracle, D.B., and Nathal, M.V., TMS, Warrendale, PA, p. 869 (1993).Google Scholar
8. Brady, M.P., Smialek, J.L., and Humphrey, D.L, Electrochemical Society Extended Abstracts, Fall (1994).Google Scholar
9. Gleeson, B., private communication (Oct. 1994).Google Scholar
10. Chen, Y., Young, D.J., and Gleeson, B., Materials Letters (in press).Google Scholar
11. Zhang, M.-X, Hsieh, K.-C, DeKock, J., and Chang, Y.A., Scripta Met., 27, pp. 1361–1366 (1992).Google Scholar
12. Huang, S-C. and Hall, E.L., Met. Trans. A, 22, 1991, p. 2619.Google Scholar
13. Brady, M.P. and Smialek, J.L., to be published in Nasa Lewis Research and Technology (1994).Google Scholar