Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-s9k8s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T13:10:57.326Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Migration of Aluminum Atoms in the Transformation of γ–to θ–Alumina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Shu-Hui Cai  and
Karl Sohlberg
Shu-Hui Cai
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, P.R.C. Department of Chemistry, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104, U.S.A.
Karl Sohlberg
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

γ– and θ–alumina are two metastable phases of aluminum oxide observed along the thermal dehydration sequence of boehmite before conversion to the final product α–alumina. The transformation from γ– to θ–alumina was studied by using Al16O24 cells. Motion of some Al atoms from their γalumina positions to new positions and no O motions result in an approximate structure that, upon relaxation by first-principles calculations, becomes the known θ–alumina structure. Total-energy calculations along the paths of the atomic motions have been used to map out transformation pathways. The model accurately predicts experimentally observed domain boundaries in θ–alumina and the γ– to θ–alumina conversion rate.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 731: Symposium W – Modeling and Numerical Simulation of Materials Behavior and Evolution , 2002 , W3.6
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Knözinger, H. and Ratnasamy, P., Catal. Rev.-Sci. Eng. 17, 31 (1978).Google Scholar
2. Che, M. and Bennett, C. O., Adv. Catal. 36, 55 (1989).Google Scholar
3. Satterfield, C. N., Heterogeneous Catalysis in Practice, (McGraw-Hill: New York, 1980), section 4.5.Google Scholar
4. Gate, B. C., Chem. Rev. 95, 511 (1995).Google Scholar
5. Wefers, K. and Misra, C., Oxides and Hydroxides of Aluminum (Alcoa, 1987).Google Scholar
6. Levin, I. and Brandon, D., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 81, 1995 (1998) and references therein.Google Scholar
7. Sohlberg, K., Pennycook, S. J. and Pantelides, S. T., Chem. Eng. Comm. 181, 107 (2000).Google Scholar
8. Wolverton, C. and Hass, K. C., Phys. Rev. B 63, 024102 (2001) and references therein.Google Scholar
9. Kohn, W. and Sham, L. J., Phys. Rev. 140A, 1133 (1965).Google Scholar
10. Perdew, J. P., Phys. Rev. B 33, 8822 (1986).Google Scholar
11. Payne, M. C., Teter, M. P., Allan, D. C., Arias, T. A. and Joannopoulos, J. D., Rev. Mod. Phys. 64, 1045 (1992).Google Scholar
12. Vanderbilt, D., Phys. Rev. B 41, 7892 (1990).Google Scholar
13. Monkhorst, H. J. and Pack, J. D., Phys. Rev. B 13, 5188 (1976).Google Scholar
14. Sohlberg, K., Pennycook, S. J. and Pantelides, S. T., Recent Research Developments in Physical Chemistry, 4(part I), 71 (2000).Google Scholar
15. Zhou, R-S. and Snyder, R. L., Acta Cryst. B47, 617 (1991) and references therein.Google Scholar
16. Borosy, A. P., Silvi, B., and Allavena, M., J. Phys. Chem. 98, 13189 (1994).Google Scholar
17. Levin, I., Bendersky, L. A., Brandon, D. G. and Rühle, M., Acta Mater. 45, 3659 (1997).Google Scholar